Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:57:47.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging the Spacetime Structuralist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Christian Wüthrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Structural realist interpretations of generally relativistic spacetimes have recently come to enjoy a remarkable degree of popularity among philosophers. I present a challenge to these structuralist interpretations that arises from considering cosmological models in general relativity. As a consequence of their high degree of spacetime symmetry, these models resist a structuralist interpretation. I then evaluate the various strategies available to the structuralist to react to this challenge.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 5 , December 2009 , pp. 1039 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

First and foremost, I wish to thank John Earman for proposing the topic to me and for his many suggestions that have invariably led to improvements of the article. I am also indebted to Craig Callender, Jonathan Cohen, Vincent Lam, and Ioan Muntean for comments and discussions. Thanks go to audiences at Lausanne, Geneva, and the Philosophy of Science Association (PSA) meeting. Interestingly, at the PSA, there was an advocate for each of the exit strategies I propose in the audience, as became clear during the discussion period. Finally, I wish to thank my fellow collaborators in the Swiss National Science Foundation project “Properties and Relations” for stimulating intellectual exchange with them. This research has been funded in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation project “Properties and Relations” (100011–113688).

References

Bain, Jonathan (2006), “Spacetime Structuralism”, in Dieks, Dennis (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max (1952), “The Identity of Indiscernibles”, The Identity of Indiscernibles 61:153–164.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro (2000), “Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism”, Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism 30:1605–1628.Google Scholar
Esfeld, Michael (2004), “Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations”, Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations 35:601–617.Google Scholar
Esfeld, Michael, and Lam, Vincent (2008), “Moderate Structural Realism about Space-Time”, Moderate Structural Realism about Space-Time 160:27–46.Google Scholar
French, Steven (2006), “Identity and Individuality in Quantum Theory”, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2006 edition. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (2003), “Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure”, Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure 136:31–56.Google Scholar
Keränen, Jukka (2001), “The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism”, The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism 9:308–330.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James (2005), “Mathematical Structuralism and the Identity of Indiscernibles”, Mathematical Structuralism and the Identity of Indiscernibles 65:218–221.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James, and Ross, Don (2007), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, Oliver (2006), “Points, Particles, and Structural Realism”, in Rickles, Dean, French, Steven, and Saatsi, Juha (eds.), The Structural Foundation of Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Clarendon, 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickles, Dean, and French, Steven (2006), “Quantum Gravity Meets Structuralism: Interweaving Relations in the Foundations of Physics”, in Rickles, Dean, French, Steven, and Saatsi, Juha (eds.), The Structural Foundation of Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Clarendon, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Simon (2003), “Physics and Leibniz's Principles”, in Brading, Katherine and Castellani, Elena (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachel, John (2006), “Structure, Individuality, and Quantum Gravity”, in Rickles, Dean, French, Steven, and Saatsi, Juha (eds.), The Structural Foundation of Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Clarendon, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. G. (1944), “Completely Symmetric Spaces”, Completely Symmetric Spaces 19:219–226.Google Scholar