Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T05:08:10.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Copi's Conditional Probability Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Samuel Goldberg
Samuel Goldberg*
Affiliation:
Oberlin College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 286 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Copi, I. M. Introduction to Logic. 3rd edition. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Dale, A. I. “On a Problem in Conditional Probability.” Philosophy of Science 41 (1974): 204–206.10.1086/288587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber, R. “Re-Encountering a Counter-Intuitive Probability.” Philosophy of Science 43 (1976): 283–285.10.1086/288682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. 1. 3rd edition. New York: Wiley, 1968.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. The Scientific American Book of Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1959.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. Probability: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1960.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. G., Snell, J. L., and Thompson, G. L. Introduction to Finite Mathematics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1957.Google Scholar
Rose, L. E. “Countering a Counter-Intuitive Probability.” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972): 523–524.10.1086/288476CrossRefGoogle Scholar