Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T17:31:18.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Field and Jeffrey Conditionalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Daniel Garber
Daniel Garber*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 142 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Field, H. (1978), “A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization,” Philosophy of Science 45: pp. 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1974), Theory of Probability, vol. 1. Section 4.5. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Harper, W. L., and Hooker, C. A. (eds.), (1976), Foundations and Philosophy of Epistemic Applications of Probability Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1965), The Logic of Decision, Chapter 11. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1968), “Probable Knowledge.” In Lakatos, (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
May, S. and Harper, W. L. (1976), “Toward an Optimization Procedure for Applying Minimum Change Principles in Probability Kinematics.” In Harper and Hooker (1976).10.1007/978-94-010-1853-1_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, Paul. (1976), “Conditionalization, Observation, and Change of Preference.” In Harper and Hooker (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar