Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T23:48:43.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion Review: Justice, Theory, and a Theory of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Marcus G. Singer
Marcus G. Singer*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Rawls's A Theory of Justice was published in December 1971 and has already established itself as a landmark. No other philosophical work, in our time or before, has, to my knowledge, excited so much attention in so short a time and in such varied circles. Clearly the book answers to a set of needs that have just recently surfaced, and it was published at just the right time to benefit from changing directions in philosophy and other areas of intellectual life brought on by enormous and accelerating changes in social conditions and concerns, by the disaster of Vietnam, and by the sense that something serious and sufficient must be done to counter the increasing fragmentation of knowledge and the divorce of science from society. Rawls gives one the sense of putting it all together; of seeing things clearly and seeing them whole; of joining together again economics, jurisprudence, and social and moral theory; and of putting philosophy to work once again in the service of society and humanity. In particular, he gives one the sense that there can be a science of justice, of morality, and of values.

Type
Special Section on Value Issues in Science, Technology, and Medicine
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1977 , pp. 594 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

A review of John Rawls' A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1971. All further page references not otherwise specified are to this book.

References

[1] Cohen, M. and Nagel, E. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1934.Google Scholar
[2] Hare, R. M. “Rawls' A Theory of Justice—I.” Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1973): 144–155.10.2307/2217486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[4] Johnson, C. D. “Moral and Legal Obligation.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 315–333.10.2307/2025132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Murdoch, I. The Sovereignty of Good. New York: Schocken Books, 1971.Google Scholar
[6] Oberdiek, H. “Review of Rawls: A Theory of Justice.” New York University Law Review 47 (1972): 1012–1028.Google Scholar
[7] Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[8] Rawls, J. “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.” Philosophical Review 60 (1951): 177–197.10.2307/2181696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Russell, B. Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1926.Google Scholar
[10] Sidgwick, H. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1907.Google Scholar
[11] Sidgwick, H. The Elements of Politics. 4th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1919.Google Scholar
[12] Singer, P. “Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium.” The Monist 58 (1974): 490–517.10.5840/monist197458330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Singer, P. “Philosophers are Back on the Job.” New York Times Magazine July 7, 1974. Pages 6–7, 17–20.Google Scholar
[14] Spencer, H. Social Statics. London: John Chapman, 1851.Google Scholar
[15] Spencer, H. The Data of Ethics. Part I of The Principles of Ethics. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1910.Google Scholar