Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T12:17:21.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Essay Review: Scientific Pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

The basic education of philosophers of science during the second half of the twentieth century was founded on the seven Rs: the three basic Rs and the topics of Rationality, Realism, Reductionism, and Relativism. The topic and ideas in this volume are foundational and challenging. They challenge and replace the ancient notion of philosophy as unified knowledge and the corresponding images of the tree of knowledge and encyclopedia forests.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cat, J. 2007. “The Unity of Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-unity.Google Scholar
Cat, J. 2010. “Cooperation, Conflicts and Compromises: A New Look at the Complications of Synthesis in Scientific Practice.” Order Project discussion paper, Center for the Philosophy of the Natural and Social Sciences, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Cat, J. 2011. “On Understanding Understanding.” International Journal for Philosophy of Science 25 (4): 405–11.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. H. 2008. Borrowed Knowledge: Chaos Theory and the Challenge of Learning across Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar