Hostname: page-component-754f97d4cd-hs6z8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-22T11:22:48.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Function Ascription Practices in Circuit Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2026

Caitlin Mace*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, caitlin.mace@pitt.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Accessibility of Accepted Manuscripts

Accepted Manuscripts are early, peer-reviewed versions that have not yet been copyedited, typeset, or formally published and may not meet all accessibility standards. A fully formatted accessible version will follow.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Novel tools have allowed researchers to intervene into circuits at the mesoscale. The results of these interventions are often explained by appeal to functions. How are functions ascribed to circuit parts experimentally? I identify two kinds of function ascription practices in circuit interventions. Analysis of these practices shows us that what makes function ascriptions challenging is a lack of interventive control and insufficient constraints on the class of candidate functions to discriminate in practice. One kind of function ascription practice—subtractive analysis—fares better at addressing these challenges.

Information

Type
Symposia Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association