Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T00:33:49.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Function Statements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Achinstein
Peter Achinstein*
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An examination of difficulties in three standard accounts of functions leads to the suggestion that sentences of the form “the function of x is to do y” are used to make a variety of different claims, all of which involve a means-end relationship and the idea of design, or use, or benefit. The analysis proposed enables us to see what is right and also wrong with accounts that analyze the meaning of function statements in terms of good consequences, goals, and etiological explanation. It also enables us to show that function sentences can be used in providing various types of explanations, including, in certain cases, noncausal explanations of the presence of the item with the function.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 341 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I am indebted to Stephen Barker, Robert Cummins, Dale Gottlieb, and George Wilson for making a number of very helpful suggestions.

References

[1] Achinstein, P. “What is an Explanation?” American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1977): 1–15.Google Scholar
[2] Achinstein, P. Review of Michael Ruse's Philosophy of Biology. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1975): 745–754.10.1080/00455091.1975.10716093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Ayala, F. “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1970): 1–15.10.1086/288276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bennett, J. Linguistic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[5] Boorse, C. “Wright on Functions.” Philosophical Review 85 (1976): 70–86.10.2307/2184255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Canfield, J. “Teleological Explanation in Biology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (1963): 285–295.10.1093/bjps/XIV.56.285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Cummins, R. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 741–765.10.2307/2024640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Frankfurt, H. and Poole, B. “Functional Analyses in Biology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1966): 69–72.Google Scholar
[9] Geach, P. “Teleological Explanation.” In Explanation. Edited by Körner, S., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975. Pages 76–95.Google Scholar
[10] Hempel, C. G. “The Logic of Functional Analysis.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 1965. Pages 297–330.Google Scholar
[11] Hull, D. The Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
[12] Lehman, H. “Functional Explanation in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 32 (1965): 1–20.10.1086/288022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Levin, M. E. “On The Ascription of Functions to Objects, with Special Reference to Inference in Archaeology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (1976): 227–234.10.1177/004839317600600303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Nagel, E. Structure of Science New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.10.1119/1.1937571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Ruse, M. The Philosophy of Biology London: Hutchinson, 1973.Google Scholar
[16] Sorabji, R. “Function.” Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1964): 289–302.10.2307/2217769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Wimsatt, W. “Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 1–80.Google Scholar
[18] Woodfield, A. Teleology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[19] Wright, L. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82 (1973): 139–168.10.2307/2183766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Wright, L. Teleological Explanations. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar