Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:32:12.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nature and Society in Social Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Ernest Gellner
Ernest Gellner*
Affiliation:
The London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is concerned to argue that the social sciences and notably social anthropology, must necessarily be concerned with the physical environment of the societies investigated (which includes the biological nature of its members), and not only with the social reality which is at the centre of their concern. This is argued with special reference to fields such as kinship and politics, and to social relationships such as paternity or feuding. The article is concerned to refute arguments put forward in support of the logical autonomy of social studies, particularly in the sphere of kinship, in earlier articles by Barnes and Needham.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 1963 , pp. 236 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Barnes, J. A., “Kinship”, article in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1959.Google Scholar
[2] Barnes, J. A., “Physical and Social Kinship”, Philosophy of Science, 28, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Barth, F., Political Leadership among Swat Pathans, London, 1959.Google Scholar
[4] Berque, J., Structures Sociales du Haut-Atlas, Paris, 1955.Google Scholar
[5] Bousquet, H. G., Les Berbères, Paris, P.U.F., 1957.Google Scholar
[6] Gellner, E., “Ideal Language and Kinship Structure”, Philosophy of Science, 24, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Gellner, E., “Concepts and Society”, (published in the proceedings of the 1962 World Sociological Congress, Washington, D. C.)Google Scholar
[8] Gellner, E., “The Concept of Kinship”, Philosophy of Science, 27, 1960.10.1086/287724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Homans, G. C., The Human Group, 1951.Google Scholar
[10] Leach, E., “The Epistemological Background to Malinowski's Empericism”, P. 119 of Man and Culture, edited by Raymond Firth, London, 1957.Google Scholar
[11] London School of Economics and Political Science, “Calendar, 1961–62,” London, 1961.Google Scholar
[12] Maugham, S., The Razor's Edge, London, 1944.Google Scholar
[13] Monteil, V., Les Officiers, 1958.Google Scholar
[14] Nadel, S. F., The Theory of Social Structure, London, 1957.Google Scholar
[15] Needham, R., “Descent Systems and Ideal Language”, Philosophy of Science, 27, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Stendhal, Lucien Leuwen, (Various editions.)Google Scholar
[17] Winch, P., The Idea of a Social Science, London, 1958.Google Scholar