Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T11:03:06.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Of Minds and Molecules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Francis V. Raab*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota

Abstract

“Of Minds and Molecules” attempts to show the difficulties in mental-state brain-state monism. By exploring the differences in meaning between mental-state sentences and brain-state sentences, and by analysing the implications of the theory of the molecular composition of matter, a kind of dualism is arrived at that no scientist should feel uncomfortable with. It is a dualism without mental substance but it does not deprive mental states of their uniqueness. Arguments are given for the propriety of asserting causal connections and dependency relations between mental states and molecular states of the brain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Feigl, H., “The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’ “, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. II, University of Minnesota Press, (1958).Google Scholar
[2] Patterson, W. B., Wound Healing and Tissue Repair, University of Chicago Press, (1959).Google Scholar
[3] Penfield, W. and Roberts, Lamar. Ch. 1, Speech and Brain Mechanisms, Princeton Press, (1959).Google Scholar
[4] Place, U. T., “Is Consciousness a Brain Process ?”, British Journal of Psychology, XLVII, (1956), pp. 4450.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1956.tb00560.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Sears, F. W. and Zemansky, M. W., p. 688, College Physics, 3rd Ed. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
[6] Smart, J. J. C., “Sensations Brain Processes”, The Philosophical Review, LXVIII, (April, 1959), pp. 141156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Strawson, P. F., Individuals, p. 106, Methuen, (1959).Google Scholar