Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-h2dfl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-11T07:30:55.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulations, Models, and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and Their Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Eric Winsberg
Eric Winsberg*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, FAO 226, Tampa, FL 33620.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using an example of a computer simulation of the convective structure of a red giant star, this paper argues that simulation is a rich inferential process, and not simply a “number crunching” technique. The scientific practice of simulation, moreover, poses some interesting and challenging epistemological and methodological issues for the philosophy of science. I will also argue that these challenges would be best addressed by a philosophy of science that places less emphasis on the representational capacity of theories (and ascribes that capacity instead to models) and more emphasis on the role of theory in guiding (rather than determining) the construction of models.

Information

Type
Theories, Models and Analogies
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 68 , Issue S3: No. 3 Supplement: Proceedings of the 2000 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 2001 , 2001 , pp. S442 - S454
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

Some of the ideas discussed here come from my dissertation, and I am grateful to members of my committee, especially Frederick Suppe, Michael Friedman, and Michael Dickson, for feedback. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at Northwestern University and in Vancouver, and many attendees made helpful comments, especially Arthur Fine, Mathias Frisch, Steven Kellert, and Mauricio Suarez. Some of the research for this project was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship at Northwestern University.

References

Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1994), “The Metaphysics of the Disunified World”, in PSA 1994, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 357–364.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1998), “How Theories Relate: Takeovers or Partnerships?”, Philosophia Naturalis 54:23–34.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Mark, Porter, David, and Woodward, Paul (1998), “3-D Numerical Models of Red Giant Stars”, American Astronomical Society Meeting #193, abstract.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William and Smarr, Lawrence (1993), Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Moin, Parviz and John, Kim (1997), “Tackling Turbulence with Supercomputer”, Scientific American 276(1): 62–68.10.1038/scientificamerican0197-62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary and Morrison, Margaret (1999), Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Margaret (1998), “Modeling Nature: Between Physics and the Physical World”, Philosophia Naturalis 54:65–85.Google Scholar
Porter, David and Woodward, Paul (1994), “High-Resolution Simulations of Compressible Convection Using the Piecewise-Parabolic Method”, The Astrophysical Journal 93 (Supplement): 309–321.10.1086/192057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, David, Anderson, Sarah, and Woodward, Paul (1998), “Simulating a Pulsating Red Giant Star”, preprint.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Jeffrey (1992), “An Expanded Epistemology of Approximations”, in PSA 1992, vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 154–166.Google Scholar
Smarr, Lawrence (1985), “An Approach to Complexity”, Science 228:403–408.10.1126/science.228.4698.403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stöckler, Martin (1998), “On the Unity of Physics in a Dappled World: Comment on Nancy Cartwright”, Philosophia Naturalis 54:35–39.Google Scholar
Suarez, Maurico (1999), “The Role of Models in the Application of Scientific Theories: Epistemological Implications”, in Morgan, M.S. and Morrison, M.C. (eds.), Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (ed.) (1974), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (ed.) (1989), The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick (1962), “Models of Data”, in Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1970), “On the extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories”, Philosophy of Science 37:325–338.10.1086/288311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelmson, Robert, Jewett, Brian, Shaw, Crystal, Wicker, Louis, Arrott, Matthew, Bushell, Colleen, Bajuk, Mark, Thingvold, Jeffrey, and Yost, Jerry (1990), “A Study of the Evolution of a Numerically Modeled Severe Storm”, The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 4(2): 20–36.10.1177/109434209000400203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, Eric (1999), “Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation”, Science in Context, 12(2): 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar