Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T01:33:22.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Theory of Event Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Alfred J. Stenner
Alfred J. Stenner*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper takes the first steps in the construction of a theory of event identity as that theory applies to historical sentences. The theory is extensional throughout. Following statements of criteria of adequacy for the construction, Davidson's method of regimenting sentences is adopted in order to allow for variables ranging over events. Events in this theory are only partially construed, that is, to the extent of treating them as concrete individuals rather than as classes or repeatable universals. The paper concludes with a statement of several theorems and definitions and an example of how the theory works.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 65 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This is an expanded and somewhat revised version of a paper read to the Colloquium of the Department of Philosophy at Washington University during the spring of 1972. I am grateful to several of my colleagues and students for helpful comments and suggestions and to one of the referees of this paper for saving me from some “howlers” with respect to the conditions of adequacy.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Anscombe, G. E. M. Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar
[2] Chisholm, R. “States of Affairs Again.” Noûs 5 (1971): 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Clark, R. “Concerning the Logic of Predicate Modifiers.” Noûs 4 (1970): 311–335.10.2307/2214677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Danto, A. Analytical Philosophy of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[5] Davidson, D. “The Individuation of Events.” in Essays in Honor of C. G. Hempel. Edited by Rescher, N. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1970. Pages 216–234.Google Scholar
[6] Davidson, D. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” in The Logic of Decision and Action. Edited by Rescher, N. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967. Pages 81–95.Google Scholar
[7] Davidson, D. “On Events and Event-Descriptions.” in Fact and Existence. Edited by Margolis, J. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969. Pages 74–84.Google Scholar
[8] Goldman, A. “The Individuation of Action.” Journal of Philosophy LXVIII (1971): 761–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Goldman, A. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
[10] Goodman, N. “About.” Mind LXX (1961): 1–24.10.1093/mind/LXX.277.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Goodman, N. The Structure of Appearance. (2nd ed.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar
[12] Goodman, N. and Leonard, H. “The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (1940): 45–55.Google Scholar
[13] Kenny, A. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
[14] Lemmon, E. J. “Comments on Davidson's ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’.” in The Logic of Decision and Action. Edited by Rescher, N. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967. Pages 96–103.Google Scholar
[15] Martin, R. M. “On Events and Event Descriptions.” Fact and Existence. Edited by Margolis, J. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969. Pages 63–74, 97–109.Google Scholar
[16] Massey, G. “Tense Logic! Why Bother?” Noûs 3 (1969): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Quine, W. V. O. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
[18] Ramsey, F. P. “Facts and Propositions.” in Foundations of Mathematics. Edited by Braithwaite, R. B. Patterson, New Jersey: Littlefield Adams, 1960. Pages 138–141.Google Scholar
[19] Salmon, W. “Comment on R. M. Martin's ‘On Events and Event-Descriptions’.” in Fact and Existence. Edited by Margolis, J. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[20] Strawson, P. F. Individuals. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1963.Google Scholar