Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T00:42:13.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual Representations and Confirmation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Laura Perini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Publications in contemporary science journals often include figures like graphs, diagrams, photographs, and MRIs, which are presented as support for the hypothesis the author is defending. As a first step to explaining how figures contribute to confirmation, I present an account of visual representation and use examples to show how the visual format is involved in the support those figures provide the authors’ conclusions. I then show that attempts to explain what figures contribute to scientific arguments without analyzing them as visual representations (for example by translating them into linguistic representations) will not succeed.

Type
Causality, Confirmation and Inference
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 913 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I wish to thank Sandy Mitchell, Paul Churchland, Brian Keeley, and Deborah Mayo for their valuable comments on this paper.

References

Brown, James R. (1996), “Illustration and Inference”, in Baigrie, Brian (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Morán, Humberto (1962), “Cell-Membrane Ultrastructure: Low-Temperature Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Diffraction Studies of Lipoprotein Components in Lamellar Systems”, Cell-Membrane Ultrastructure: Low-Temperature Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Diffraction Studies of Lipoprotein Components in Lamellar Systems 26:1039–1065.Google ScholarPubMed
Files, Craig (1996), “Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance”, Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance 36:398–402.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald (1996), “Visual Models and Scientific Judgment”, in Baigrie, Brian (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1976), Languages of Art: An Approach to the Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Penefsky, H., Pullman, E., Datta, A., and Racker, E. (1960), “Partial Resolution of the Enzymes Catalyzing Oxidative Phosphorylation II”, Partial Resolution of the Enzymes Catalyzing Oxidative Phosphorylation II 235:3330–3336.Google Scholar
Perini, Laura (2005), “The Truth in Pictures”, The Truth in Pictures 71:262–286.Google Scholar
Pullman, M. E., Penefsky, H., Datta, A., and Racker, E. (1960), “Partial Resolution of the Enzymes Catalyzing Oxidative Phosphorylation I”, Partial Resolution of the Enzymes Catalyzing Oxidative Phosphorylation I 235:3322–3329.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1991), “Taming the Dimensions—Visualizations in Science” in Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Wessels, L. (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 111–135.Google Scholar