Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-12T13:45:18.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing the World. by David Chalmers. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 528, £30. ISBN: 978-0-19-960857-7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2013

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Carnap, Rudolf, Der Logische Aufbau Der Welt (Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1928)Google Scholar. Translated as The Logical Structure of the World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

2 An especially influential argument for this conclusion is made by Chisholm, Roderick, ‘The Problem of Empiricism’, Journal of Philosophy 45 (1948): 512–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Quine, W. V., ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Philosophical Review 60 (1951): 2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Chalmers, David J., ‘Revisability and Conceptual Change in Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Journal of Philosophy 108 (2011): 387415CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Block, Ned and Stalnaker, Robert, ‘Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap’, Philosophical Review 108 (1999): 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Chalmers discusses ghost heat on page 124 of his book, but not in a way that addresses my objection here.

7 For an analogy, consider the literature devoted to finding truthmakers for negative truths. Russell, Bertrand in ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, The Monist (1918): 295527Google Scholar, posits a broad range of negative facts, an analog to the view just considered. Armstrong, D. M. in Truth and Truthmakers (Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar posits a single totality fact, an analog to Chalmers' that's-all truth.