Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T03:02:47.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morality and Luck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Henning Jensen
Henning Jensen
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thomas Nagel recognizes that it is commonly believed that people can neither be held morally responsible nor morally assessed for what is beyond their control. Yet he is convinced that although such a belief may be intuitively plausible, upon reflection we find that we do make moral assessments of persons in a large number of cases in which such assessments depend on factors not under their control. Of such factors he says: ‘Wherea significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, itcan be called moral luck’ (p. 26).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 59 , Issue 229 , July 1984 , pp. 323 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Thomas, Nagel, ‘Moral Luck’ in Mortal Questions by Thomas, Nagel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979). Page references in brackets are to this article.Google Scholar

2 For a related analysis of the concept of fault see Joel Feinberg's article ‘Sua Culpa’, in his Doing and Deserving (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

3 Immanuel, Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals in Immanuel Kant: Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, Lewis White, Beck (trans, and ed.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949), 88.Google Scholar

4 Immanuel, Kant, The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue, James, Ellington (trans.) (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., TheLibrary of Liberal Arts, 1964), 46.Google Scholar

5 I am indebted to Joel Feinberg for his helpful comments concerning this paper.