No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Affirmation And Assertion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
Positivists have always objected to people talking about God.
Their objection rests on quite general logical grounds. They have discovered a simple, formal test by which to tell significant remarks from nonsensical collections of words. There must, they say, be some minimal conditions of intelligibility. From these we can construct a Principle of Meaning. Now religiousremarks, on any positivist Principle, are demonstrable nonsense.
What are these conditions of intelligibility ? Speaker and hearer, we suppose, must use the same language; must possess a rather similar background of information; must both have some interest or other in communication.… Such matters of ‘more and less’ will vary with the topic, the parties, and the occasion.
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1964
References
page 121 note 1 A. G. N. Flew (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, p. 96 sq.Google Scholar
page 121 note 2 Op. cit. p. 98.Google Scholar
page 123 note 1 Austin, J. L., P.A.S. Supp. 1946, pp. 170-175.Google Scholar
page 123 note 2 Hart, H. L. A., P.A.S. 1948-49, pp. 171sq.Google Scholar
page 123 note 3 Cp. I. and Opie, P., Lore and Language of Schoolchildren, ch. 8.Google Scholar
page 127 note 1 So Wittgenstein in the Tractatus. It is said that he later got this out of his system. But it reappears in those ofhis successors.Google Scholar
page 128 note 1 Contra Gentiles, I, 30-34;Google Scholarcp. White, V., God the Unknown, Ch. II.Google Scholar
page 128 note 2 cp. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, B 432sq. (the Antinomies);Google ScholarCrombie, I. M. in Faith and Logic, ed. Mitchell, , 1957, pp. 46–48.Google Scholar
page 128 note 3 v. Wittgenstein, , Tractatus, 5.542, and my article in Mind 1958.Google Scholar
page 129 note 1 P.A.S. Supp. XX, 1946, p. 1.
page 131 note 1 Cp. John 9.25, ‘This one thing I know …’.
page 131 note 2 Prolegomena, ed. Lucas, (Manchester University Press), 1953, p. 56.Google Scholar
page 132 note 1 Well put by James, W., Pragmatism, Lecture V.Google Scholar
page 132 note 2 Cp. Collingwood, R. G., Metaphysics, ch. V-VII and Part III.Google Scholar
page 133 note 1 v. Forster, E. M., Howards End; and Jonah (anon.).Google Scholar
page 134 note 1 Op. cit. p. 97.Google Scholar
page 134 note 2 In ‘Hongkong Fir Shipping v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha’, Times haw Report, 21.12.61.Google Scholar
page 136 note 1 Buber, M., Eclipse of God, p. 50.Google Scholar