Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Collodel, Matteo 2016. Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 57, p. 27.


Empirical Statements And Falsifiability

  • Carl G. Hempel (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2009

1. Object of this note. In his lively essay, “Between Analytic and Empirical,” (Philosophy, April 1957), Mr. J. W. N. Watkins challenges the empiricist identification of synthetic statements with empirical ones by arguing that there exists an important class of statements which are synthetic, i.e. not analytically true or false, and yet not empirical. I find Mr. Watkins's arguments very stimulating, but I do not think they provide a sound basis for his contention. In the present note, I wish to indicate what seem to me the principal flaws in Mr. Watkins's reasoning, and to make some additional comments on the issues raised by his discussion.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Carnap , “Testability and Meaning,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3 (1936), pp. 419–71, and Vol. 4 (1937), pp. 1–40;

Cf., for example, my articles “The Concept of Cognitive Significance: A Reconsideration”, Proc. Amer. Acad. of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 80, No. I (1951), pp. 6177;

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *