Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T02:17:18.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolutionary v. Evolved Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Neil Tennant
Affiliation:
University of Stirling

Extract

Kant writes: If … the only aim of Nature regarding some creature possessed of reason and a will were its preservation, its well-being, in a word its happiness, then she would have come to a very bad arrangement in choosing its reason as executor of that aim. For all actions that it had to execute in this her intention, and the whole regulation of its behaviour would have been able to be prescribed to it much more precisely by instinct, and that aim thereby much more certainly maintained, than ever could happen through reason …

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable