Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T07:28:26.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Figuring Things Out, Morally Speaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2021

Leo Zaibert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The appeal of the moral principle according to which we should treat like cases alike is so great that it verges on the axiomatic, or on the platitudinous. Recently, however, the principle has been challenged in deeply interesting ways. These ways are interesting because they do not invite skepticism about morality at large, but about the specific claim that what is good (or bad) for an agent in a given situation must be good (or bad) for any other similarly situated agent. I here assess the post-challenge viability of the principle. In a sense, the principle survives, but this is neither an unqualified victory nor an inspiring result. The examination of these matters contains an important (and under-investigated) lesson about the nature of moral experience.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 553 - 576
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alweiss, Lilian, ‘On Moral Dilemmas: Winch, Kant and Billy Budd’, Philosophy 78 (2003), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwell, John E., ‘A Note on Decisions, Judgments, and Universalizability’, Ethics 77 (1967), 130–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John, ‘Reasons’ in Jay Wallace, R., Pettit, Phillip, et al. , (eds.) Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Broome, John, Rationality Through Reasoning (Oxford: Blackwell, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome, ‘Life as Narrative’, Social Research 54 (1987), 11–32.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Ethics Without Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry, On Bullshit (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988).Google Scholar
Guttenplan, Samuel, ‘Moral Realism and Moral Dilemmas’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80 (1979–1980), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Discourse on Metaphysics (Chicago: Open Court, 1902).Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl, The Bramble Bush (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London: Rivington, 12th ed., 1824).Google Scholar
Melville, Herman, Billy Budd, Sailor and Other Stories (New York: Penguin Classics, 1986).Google Scholar
Montague, Roger, ‘Winch on Agents’ Judgments’, Analysis 34 (1974), 161–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Truth in Particularism’, in Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret (eds.) Moral Particularism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003, 48–78).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas, Being Realistic About Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Israel, ‘My Quarrels with Nelson Goodman’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2001), 665–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen, ‘Against Narrativity’, Ratio 17 (2004) 428–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics (London: MacMillan, 1877).Google Scholar
Wiggins, David, Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3rd ed., 2002).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’ in Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. A. O. Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter, ‘The Universalizability of Moral Judgements’, The Monist 49 (1965), 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaibert, Leo, Rethinking Punishment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaibert, Leo, ‘Desert-Sensitivity and Moral Evaluation’, in Kaspar, David (ed.) Explorations in Ethics (London: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2020) 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar