Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T00:36:11.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Freud and Pseudo-science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

V. L. Jupp
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham

Extract

It is a strange fact that people's opinions of psychoanalysis are only rarely tentative or unemphatic. It seems that one must either love it or hate it. Professor Cioffi, in a recent paper, has shown that he is no lover of psychoanalysis, and he makes what appears to be a devastating attack on Freud's theories and methods and on the credibility of the whole psychoanalytic discipline. Without wanting to ally myself wholeheartedly with the opposite camp, I want to show that many of the main contentions of his paper are wrong. I shall argue that the objections he makes which, if valid, would be the most serious for Freudian theory, are unfounded.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable