Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-v4t4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-27T13:13:23.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inconsistency in Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2020

Nora Hämäläinen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consistency is usually seen as one of the hallmarks and a cardinal virtue of moral theory, as well as of any defensible real-life moral perspective. In everyday life a consistent set of moral beliefs is conductive to moral clarity, communicability, responsibility and responsiveness. But this is just one side of the story. In this paper I argue that inconsistency, properly understood, is a productive and constructive aspect of both moral philosophy and our moral lives. After an introductory glance at Ralf Waldo Emerson and Hannah Arendt, the argument proceeds in three main steps. First, I discuss the philosophical importance of paying heed to inconsistencies in our moral lives, which often are prematurely pruned from moral philosophy. Second, I discuss the positive moral roles of inconsistency in terms of responsiveness to different situations, values, needs and concerns that call upon our attention in everyday life. Third, I argue that moral inconsistencies contribute to the necessary adaptability of our moral understandings to changing conditions. Fourth, in the place of a conclusion, I revisit the issue of consistency, clarity and accountability.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 447 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition. Second edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette, Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Benatar, David, Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Clarendon Press 2008) 242–63.Google Scholar
Biehl, Joao, ‘Care and disregard’, in A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Ed. Fassin, Didier (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012) 242–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, J.M., Elizabeth Costello (London: Vintage 2004).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G., An Essay on Philosophical Method, eds. Connely, James and D'Oro, Giuseppina (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Ethics Without Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Veena, Life and Words. Violence and the Decent into the Ordinary (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora, ‘The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy’, in Cavell, Stanley, Diamond, Cora, MacDowell, John, Hacking, Ian and Wolfe, Cary, Philosophy and Animal Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralf Waldo, ‘Self-reliance’. In The essential Writings of Ralf Waldo Emerson (New York: Random House, Modern Library, 2000).Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, Nora, Literature and Moral Theory (New York: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, Nora, Descriptive Ethics: What does Moral Philosophy Know about Morality (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William, ‘The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life’, in Pragmatism and Other Writings (London: Penguin, 2000).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy’, in Practical Philosophy, trans. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Moody-Adams, Michele, Fieldwork in Familiar Places (Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, ed. Kaufman, W., trans. Kaufman, J. and Hollingdale, R.J. (New York: Vintage Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul, 10 Moral Paradoxes (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Unger, Peter, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban, Moral Contexts (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, ‘The Problem of Dirty Hands’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2 (1973), 160–80.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, ‘Ethical consistency’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volumes), 39 (1965), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana, Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar