Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Is Nuclear Deterrence Ethical?

  • Leslie Stevenson (a1)

We are morally perplexed about nuclear weapons. Popular debate oscillates tediously between an apparently impractical idealism which would have nothing to do with the things, and a military and political realism which insists that we have to use such means to attain our legitimate ends. The choice, it too often seems, is between laying down our nuclear arms–thus avoiding the moral odium of resting our defence policies on threats to vaporize millions of civilians–but leaving ourselves open to domination by those who do not feel such scruples, and on the other hand, retaining such weapons as long as our potential enemies possess them, constantly maintaining parity with the other side–in other words, proceeding with the arms race. The respective proponents of principle and of prudence typically fail to understand how others can possibly neglect the considerations which loom so large in their own minds. Each has at bottom a deeply held ethical view–that certain means (deployment of nuclear weapons) may not be used for any end, or that certain ends (defending our freedom and national sovereignty) are so important that they justify the use of almost any means. The disagreement is so irreconcilable that it spills out from TV studios and newspaper editorial pages on to the streets and the missile bases, and into the courts and the prisons.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. S. Kavka , ‘Some Paradoxes of Deterrence’, Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978), 285302;

J. Ford , ‘The Morality of Obliteration Bombing’, Theological Studies 5 (1944), reprinted in War and Morality, R. Wasserstrom (ed.) (Belmont, California: Wadsworth1970).

W. H. Shaw , ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Deontology’, Ethics 94 (1984), 248260.

J. E. Hare and C. B. Joynt , Ethics and International Affairs (London: Macmillan, 1982), Ch. 5.

R. P. Ehrlich , ‘Long-term Biological Consequences of Nuclear War’, Science 222 (121983), 12831300.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.