Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 255
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Allmark, Peter 2016. Aristotle for nursing. Nursing Philosophy,


    Boesch, Brandon 2016. A MacIntyrean Critique of Theoretical Pluralism in Applied Ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 9, p. 41.


    Borden, Sandra L. 2016. Aristotelian Casuistry: Getting into the Thick of Global Media Ethics. Communication Theory, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 329.


    Briggle, Adam Holbrook, J. Britt Oppong, Joseph Hoffmann, Joesph Larsen, Elizabeth K. and Pluscht, Patrick 2016. Research Ethics Education in the STEM Disciplines: The Promises and Challenges of a Gaming Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 237.


    Efstathiou, Sophia 2016. Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 56, p. 48.


    Furey, Heidi 2016. Aristotle and Autism: Reconsidering a Radical Shift to Virtue Ethics in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics,


    Gotthelf, Allan 2016. A Companion to Ayn Rand.


    Han, Hyemin 2016. How can neuroscience contribute to moral philosophy, psychology and education based on Aristotelian virtue ethics?. International Journal of Ethics Education,


    Herdt, Jennifer A. 2016. Aquinas and the Democratic Virtues: An Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 232.


    Killoren, David 2016. Robust moral realism: an excellent religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 79, Issue. 3, p. 223.


    Löfquist, Lars 2016. Virtues and humanitarian ethics. Disasters, p. n/a.


    LOUGHEED, KIRK and SIMPSON, ROBERT MARK 2016. Indirect epistemic reasons and religious belief. Religious Studies, p. 1.


    Mullen, Caroline and Marsden, Greg 2016. Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 18, p. 109.


    MULLER, HANS D. 2016. Sympathy for Whom? Smith's Reply to Hume. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 2, Issue. 02, p. 212.


    Narvaez, Darcia 2016. Embodied Morality.


    Ozar, Anne C. 2016. Smith, William Hosmer: The Phenomenology of Moral Normativity. Husserl Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 67.


    Paulo, Norbert 2016. The Confluence of Philosophy and Law in Applied Ethics.


    Paulo, Norbert 2016. The Confluence of Philosophy and Law in Applied Ethics.


    Piliavsky, Anastasia and Sbriccoli, Tommaso 2016. The ethics of efficacy in North India'sgoonda raj(rule of toughs). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 373.


    Plaisance, Patrick Lee 2016. Media Ethics Theorizing, Reoriented: A Shift in Focus for Individual-Level Analyses. Journal of Communication, Vol. 66, Issue. 3, p. 454.


    ×

Modern Moral Philosophy1

  • G. E. M. Anscombe (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943
  • Published online: 01 February 2009
Abstract

I will begin by stating three theses which I present in this paper. The first is that it is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking. The second is that the concepts of obligation, and duty—moral obligation and moral duty, that is to say—and of what is morally right and wrong, and of the moral sense of “ought,” ought to be jettisoned if this is psychologically possible; because they are survivals, or derivatives from survivals, from an earlier conception of ethics which no longer generally survives, and are only harmful without it. My third thesis is that the differences between the wellknown English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×