Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:33:16.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Time to Move: Motion, Painting and Temporal Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2020

Jack Shardlow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the senses in which paintings do and do not depict various temporal phenomena, such as motion, stasis and duration. I begin by explaining the popular – though not uncontroversial – assumption that depiction, as a pictorial form of representation, is a matter of an experiential resemblance between the pictorial representation and that which it is a depiction of. Given this assumption, I illustrate a tension between two plausible claims: that paintings do not depict motion in the sense that video recordings do, and that paintings do not merely depict objects but may depict those objects as engaged in various activities, such as moving. To resolve the tension, I demonstrate that we need to recognise an ambiguity in talk of the appearance of motion, and distinguish between the depiction of motion and the depiction of an object as an object that is moving. Armed with this distinction, I argue that there is an important sense in which paintings depict neither motion, duration, nor – perhaps more controversially – stasis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 239 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, Catharine, ‘Canny Resemblance’, Philosophical Review, 118 (2009), 183–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benovsky, Jiri, ‘Photographic Representation and Depiction of Temporal Extension’, Inquiry, 55 (2012), 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, Charlie Dunbar, Scientific Thought (London: Kegan Paul, 1923).Google Scholar
Budd, Malcom, ‘On Looking at a Picture’, in his Aesthetic Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008a), 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, Malcolm, ‘The Look of a Picture’, in his Aesthetic Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008b), 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory, Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Carla, ‘Movement in Painting’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 17 (1958), 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst, ‘Moment and Movement in Art’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 27 (1964), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James, Three treatises: The first concerning art. The second concerning music, painting, and poetry. The third concerning happiness (London: J. Nourse and P. Vaillant, 1744).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert, ‘Explaining depiction’, Philosophical Review, 104 (1995), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Robert, Picture, Image and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hyman, John, The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, John, ‘ Depiction’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 71 (2012), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, John and Bantinaki, Katerina, ‘Depiction’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N., (Summer 2017 Edition) URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/depiction/ accessed 11 December 2017.Google Scholar
Kulvicki, John, ‘Timeless Traces of Temporal Patterns’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74 (2016), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Laocoon: An Essay upon the Limits of Painting and Poetry (1766, trans. Frothingham, Ellen, 1873; rpt. New York: Noonday Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin, ‘Time, and the static image’, Philosophy, 72 (1997), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin, The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin, ‘Motion and the Futurists: capturing the dynamic sensation’, in Phillips, Ian ed. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience (Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H., (Oxford: Clarendon Press, [1690] 1975).Google Scholar
Martin, Michael G. F., ‘What's in a Look?’, in Nanay, Bence ed. Perceiving the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 160–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Michael G. F., ‘Sounds and Images’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 52 (2012), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, Brian, Consciousness and the World (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Depiction’, Philosophical Review, 96 (1987), 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Ian, ‘Indiscriminability and Experience of Change’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 61 (2011), 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shardlow, Jack, ‘Minima sensibilia: Against the dynamic snapshot model of temporal experience’, European Journal of Philosophy, 27 (2019), 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soteriou, Matthew, The Mind's Construction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollard, Ambroise, Degas: an intimate portrait (New York: Crown, 1937).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, Painting as an Art: The Andrew W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, ‘On Pictorial Representation’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56 (1998), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, ‘What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77 (2003), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Nick and Calabi, Clotilde, ‘Can Movement Be Depicted?’, Phenomenology and Mind, 14 (2018), 170–9.Google Scholar