Skip to main content

On Wanting to Compare Wittgenstein and Zen

  • D. Z. Phillips (a1)
Hide All

1 Canfield John V., ‘Wittgenstein and Zen’, Philosophy 50, No. 194, (10 1975).

2 Philip Kapleau (Boston, 1965), 231–232. Quoted by Canfield on p. 392.

3 Bouwsma O. K., ‘Anselm's Argument’ in The Nature of Philosophical Enquiry, Bobik J. (ed.) (University of Notre Dame Press, 1970).

4 Trans. Watson Burton, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu (New York, 1968).

5 I owe this suggestion to a valuable conversation on this topic with Glyn Richards. No doubt the spiritual orientation of the dialectic would pose similar difficulties to those raised in this paper.

6 Sinyavsky Andrey, Unguarded Thoughts, trans. Harari M. (Collins, 1972).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.