Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:44:32.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the status of onglides in American English*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Stuart Davis  and
Michael Hammond
Stuart Davis
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Michael Hammond
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In many languages the issue arises as to whether an onglide patters as part of the syllable onset or forms the first part of a (rising) diphthong with the immediately following vowel. If it is part of the syllable onset, the structure of a CGV syllable would be as in (1), but if it forms the first part of a diphthong the structure of a CGV syllable could either be as in (2a) with a monomoraic diphthong (where the glide is ‘co-moraic’ with the following vowel) or as in (2b) with a bimoraic diphthong (C = consonant, G = glide, V = vowel, μ = mora, and σ = syllable).

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 159 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1986). Suprasegmental dependencies. In J, Durand (ed.) Dependency and non-linear phonology. London: Croom Helm. 55–113.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1988). More on slips and syllable structure. Phonology 5. 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1984). On resyllabification in English. WCCFL 3. 1–15.Google Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in the lexical phonology of English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & M., Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1985). Topics in syllable geometry. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona. Published 1988, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1990). The onset as a constituent of the syllable: evidence from Italian. CLS 26:2. 71–79.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1991). Coronals and the phonotactics of non-adjacent consonants in English. In C, Paradis & Prunet, J.-F. (eds.) The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. Academic Press: San Diego. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, J. (1990). Labial labial cooccurrence restrictions and syllabic structure. Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica. 129–144.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & K, Mohanan (1985). Segmental phonology of modern English. LI 16. 57–116.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1990). The name game and onset simplification. Phonology 7. 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, M. (1993). Resyllabification in English and heavy trochees. Papers from the 4th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica 4. 104–122.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1984). Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C. & H, Kim (1991). The character of Korean glides. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 21. 113–125.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LI 10. 421–441.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. (1993). Topics in the vowel phonology of Korean. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Levin, L. (1987). A look at English vowels. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 137–174.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. (1990). Vowel shift, free rides and strict cyclicity. Lingua 80. 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. (1982). Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Myers, J. (1993). A processing model of phonological rule application. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. & H, Kawasaki (1984). Prosodic phonology and phonetics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phonology Yearbook 1. 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. & P, Smolensky (1993). Optimality theory. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. (1984). Segmental rules of English and cyclic phonology. Lg 60. 21–54.Google Scholar
Scullen, M. (1993). The prosodic morphology of French. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der, Hulst & N. Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris.337–383.Google Scholar
Shaw, P. (1993). Templatic evidence for the syllable nucleus. NELS 23. 463–477.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1988). Review of Clements & Keyser (1983). Lg 64. 118–129.Google Scholar