Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-bjz6k Total loading time: 0.376 Render date: 2022-05-24T03:51:25.523Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Opacity in Šmartno Slovenian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2019

Peter Jurgec*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

Šmartno is a critically endangered dialect of Slovenian that exhibits three interacting processes: final devoicing, unstressed high vowel deletion and vowel–glide coalescence. Their interaction is opaque: final obstruents devoice, unless they become final due to vowel deletion; high vowels delete, but not when created by coalescence. These patterns constitute a synchronic chain shift that leads to two emergent contrasts: final obstruent voicing and vowel length (due to compensatory lengthening). The paper examines all nominal paradigms, and complements them with an acoustic analysis of vowel duration and obstruent voicing. This work presents one of the most thoroughly documented instances of counterfeeding opacity on environment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to my main consultant, as well as the other participants in the elicitation experiment, for their hospitality, time and effort. I would also like to thank Karmen Kenda-Jež for her suggestion to examine vowel-length contrasts in Šmartno. I am grateful to Luke Zhou for help with segmentation and to Vivian Che, Fernanda Lara Peralta, Mia Sara Misic and particularly Tina Razboršek for their assistance with elicitation. This paper has benefited from the comments of Eric Baković, Yoonjung Kang, Alexei Kochetov, Andrei Munteanu, Will Oxford, Keren Rice, Peter Staroverov, Rachel Walker, the Phonology editorial team and an anonymous reviewer. The research reported on in this paper was supported by the Connaught Young Researcher Award and a Germany-Europe Fund grant to the author.

References

Abu-Salim, Isaam M. (1982). A reanalysis of some aspects of Arabic phonology: a metrical approach. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Al-Mozainy, Hamza Q. (1981). Vowel alternations in a Bedouin Hijazi Arabic dialect: abstractness and stress. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam (2008). Inflectional paradigms have bases, too: arguments from Yiddish. In Bachrach, Asaf & Nevins, Andrew (eds.) Inflectional identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 271312.Google Scholar
Alderete, John D. (1999). Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology 24. 217259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Benjamin M. & Walker, Steven C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1998). Positional faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-234 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (to appear). Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bethin, Christina Y. (1998). Slavic prosody: language change and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethin, Christina Y. (2003). Metrical quantity in Czech: evidence from hypocoristics. In Browne, Wayles, Kim, Ji-Yung, Partee, Barbara H. & Rothstein, Robert A. (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Amherst meeting 2002. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 6382.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. (1967). Leonard Bloomfield and the phonology of the Menomini language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bezlaj, France (1939). Oris slovenskega knjižnega jezika. Ljubljana: Znanstveno Društvo.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1939). Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 8. 105115.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.21). http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Casali, Roderick F. (1998). Resolving hiatus. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine M. (2001). Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Chene, Brent & Anderson, Stephen R. (1979). Compensatory lengthening. Lg 55. 505535.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2014). Evaluating evidence for stress systems. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 149193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J. (1998). On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables. NLLT 16. 152.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. & Esling, John H. (2006). The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress: laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23. 157191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farwaneh, Samira (1995). Directionality effects in Arabic dialect syllable structure. PhD dissertation, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, Gendrot, Cédric & Burki, Audrey (2007). On the phonetic identity of French schwa compared to /ø/ and /œ/. In Crouzet, Olivier & Angoujard, Jean-Pierre (eds.) Actes des 5èmes journées d’études linguistiques: schwa(s). Nantes: Laboratoire de Linguistique de Nantes. 191198.Google Scholar
Green, Antony D. (2004). Opacity in Tiberian Hebrew: morphology, not phonology. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 37. 3770.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Marc L. (2000). A historical phonology of Slovene. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Marc L. (2008). A short reference grammar of Standard Slovene. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Hall, Erin, Jurgec, Peter & Kawahara, Shigeto (2018). Opaque allomorph selection in Japanese and Harmonic Serialism: a reply to Kurisu 2012. LI 49. 599610.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253306.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herrity, Peter (2000). Slovene: a comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich (1986). Compensatory lengthening: in defense of the concept ‘mora’. Folia Linguistica 20. 431460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1990a). Compensatory lengthening in Friulian. Probus 2. 3146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1990b). Vowel lengthening in Basque. Folia Linguistica 24. 269288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1948). Russian conjugation. Word 4. 155167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, John T. (1977). Yapese reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter (2007). Novejše besedje s stališča fonologije: primer slovenščine. DSc dissertation, University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter (2011). Slovenščina ima 9 samoglasnikov. Slavistična Revija 59. 243268.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter & Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. (2018). Indexation to stems and words. Phonology 35. 577615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapović, Mate (2015). Povijest hrvatske akcentuacije: fonetika. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Google Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya (2002). Compensatory lengthening: phonetics, phonology, diachrony. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2015). A catalogue of phonological opacity in Japanese. Version 1.2. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 46. 145174.Google Scholar
Kenda-Jež, Karmen (2002). Cerkljansko narečje: teoretični model dialektološkega raziskovanja na zgledu besedišča in glasoslovja. PhD dissertation, University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Kisseberth, Charles (1979). Generative phonology: description and theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Suksan (1997). On nonlocal compensatory lengthening. Theoretical Linguistics 23. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Robert D. (1980). The history of final devoicing in Yiddish. In Herzog, Marvin I., Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, Miron, Dan & Wisse, Ruth (eds.) The field of Yiddish 4. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues. 371430.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1971). Historical linguistics. In Dingwall, William Orr (ed.) A survey of linguistic science. College Park: University of Maryland Linguistics Program. 576642.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1973). Phonological representations. In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.) Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC. 3135.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17. 351365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2011). Chains or strata? The case of Maltese. Ms, Stanford University. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001379.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (1996). Synchronic chain shifts in Optimality Theory. LI 27. 341350.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik (2008). Slavic historical morphology: nominal paradigms. In Houtzagers, Peter, Kalsbeek, Janneke & Schaeken, Jos (eds.) Dutch contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, September 10–16, 2008: Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 397429.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Bojesen Christensen, Rune Haubo (2016). lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effect models. R package. https://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest.Google Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. (1965). Segmental phonology of Modern Standard Russian. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Logar, Tine (1977). Slovenska dialektična metatonija. Slavistična Revija 25. 4145.Google Scholar
Logar, Tine (1981). Šmartno v Brdih (OLA 4). In Ivić, Pavle (ed.) Fonološki opisi srpskohrvatskih/hrvatskosrpskih, slovenačkih i makedonskih govora obuhvaćenih opšteslovenskim lingvistivckim atlasom. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. 5358.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Grant H. (2013). Dialect leveling in Haloze, Slovenia. Maribor: Mednarodna založba Oddelka za slovanske jezike in književnosti, Filozofska fakulteta.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16. 331399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. Sheffield & Bristol, Conn.: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1993). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University. Available as ROA-482 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff, Armstrong, Mike & Hume, Elizabeth (2003). Looking through opacity. Theoretical Linguistics 29. 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morén, Bruce (2006). Consonant–vowel interactions in Serbian: features, representations and constraint interactions. Lingua 116. 11981244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van (2008). Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua 118. 13621374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2002). Russian voicing assimilation, final devoicing, and the problem of [v]. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-528 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve (2009). The transparency and density of phonological rule interactions. Linguistic Typology 13. 197265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petek, Bojan, Šuštaršič, Rastislav & Komar, Smiljana (1996). An acoustic analysis of contemporary vowels of the Standard Slovenian language. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96). Vol. 1. 133–136. Available (February 2019) at https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/archive_papers/icslp_1996/i96_0133.pdf.Google Scholar
Poliquin, Gabriel (2006). Canadian French vowel harmony. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1983). Relating to the grid. LI 14. 19100.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (2011). Vowel height. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 491518.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rood, David (2016). The phonology of Lakota voiced stops. In Rudin, Catherine & Gordon, Bryan J. (eds.) Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press. 233255.Google Scholar
Saeed, John Ibrahim (1993). Somali reference grammar. Kensington, Md.: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani (1997). Tundra Nenets inflection. Helsinki: Suomolais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Sanders, Nathan (2003). Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-603 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. (2005). Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep & Ohala, John J. (2010). What is and what is not under the control of the speaker: intrinsic vowel duration. In Fougeron, Cécile, Kühnert, Barbara, D'Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Nathalie (eds.) Laboratory phonology 10. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 607655.Google Scholar
Srebot-Rejec, Tatjana (1981). On the allophones of /v/ in Standard Slovene. Scando-Slavica 27. 233241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srebot-Rejec, Tatjana (1988). Word accent and vowel duration in Standard Slovene: an acoustic and linguistic investigation. Munich: Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan (1983). Compensatory lengthening in Slavic, 2: phonetic reconstruction. In Flier, Michael S. (ed.) American contributions to the 9th International Congress of Slavists. Vol. 1: Linguistics. Columbus: Slavica. 293319.Google Scholar
Tivadar, Hotimir (2004). Priprava, izvedba in pomen perceptivnih testov za fonetično-fonološke raziskave (na primeru analize fonoloških parov). Jezik in slovstvo 49:2. 1736.Google Scholar
Tivadar, Hotimir (2008). Kakovost in trajanje samoglasnikov v govorjenem knjižnem jeziku. PhD dissertation, University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Ida, Toivonen, Blumenfeld, Lev, Gormley, Andrea, Hoiting, Leah, Logan, John, Ramlakhan, Nalini & Stone, Adam (2015). Vowel height and duration. WCCFL 32. 6471.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože (2000). Slovenska slovnica. 4th edn. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože (ed.) (2001). Slovenski pravopis. Ljubljana: SAZU.Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francesc (2015). Length and voicing in Friulian and Milanese: or why rule-free derivations are needed. NLLT 33. 13511386.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Joan & Kemps, Rachèl (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch. JPh 32. 251276.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. (1979). Final voicing and vowel length in Welsh. Phonetica 36. 344360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley (2009). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Matthew (2008). Optimal interleaving: serial phonology–morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-996 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. (2004). Explaining final obstruent voicing in Lezgian: phonetics and history. Lg 80. 7397.Google Scholar
Žele, Andreja (2009). Vsakdanje vloge ali vplivi krajevnega govora v lokalnih medijih. In Smole, Vera (ed.) Slovenska narečja med sistemom in rabo. Ljubljana: Center za slovenščino kot drugi in tuji jezik. 543556.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Jurgec supplementary material

Appendices A-C

Download Jurgec supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 153 KB
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Opacity in Šmartno Slovenian
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Opacity in Šmartno Slovenian
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Opacity in Šmartno Slovenian
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *