Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-5dd2w Total loading time: 0.394 Render date: 2022-05-27T15:54:01.339Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Article contents

Rachel Walker (2011). Vowel patterns in language. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 130.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. x + 356.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Peter Jurgec*
Affiliation:
Meertens Institute, Amsterdam and University of Leiden

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baković, Eric (2000). Harmony, dominance, and control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-360 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1998). Positional faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-234 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea (1988). Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer & Kisseberth, Charles (1994). An optimal domains theory of harmony. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24. 101114.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine M. (2001). Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, Kathryn (2007). Templatic morphology and indexed markedness constraints. LI 38. 749758.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2007). The reduplicative template in Tonkawa. Phonology 24. 367396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2007). Blocking effects in agreement by correspondence. LI 38. 395409.Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett (2012). Alignment constraints. NLLT 30. 789836.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1995). Japanese phonology. In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 817838.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter (2010). Disjunctive lexical stratification. LI 41. 149161.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter (2011). Feature spreading 2.0: a unified theory of assimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø. Available (October 2012) athttp://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001281.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles (1994). On domains. In Cole, Jennifer & Kisseberth, Charles (eds.) Perspectives in phonology. Stanford: CSLI. 133166.Google Scholar
Li, Bing (1996). Tungusic vowel harmony: description and analysis. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2004). Headed spans and autosegmental spreading. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-685 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew (2010). Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary (2004). Vowel height harmony and blocking in Buchan Scots. Phonology 21. 359407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe (2000). Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17. 237274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe (2007). The locus of exceptionality: morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Bateman, Leah, O'Keefe, Michael, Reilly, Ehren & Werle, Adam (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory III. Amherst: GLSA. 259296.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (2009). Morpheme-specific phonology: constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Parker, Steve (ed.) Phonological argumentation: essays on evidence and motivation. London: Equinox. 123154.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher, Pater, Joe, Jesney, Karen, Bhatt, Rajesh & Becker, Michael (2010). Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology. Phonology 27. 77117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Russell (2011). Vowel harmony as Agreement by Correspondence. Ms, University of California, Berkeley. Available (October 2012) athttp://linguistics.berkeley.edu/∼russellrhodes/pdfs/abc_vh.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Lg 80. 475531.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. (2005). Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (2006). Optimality in phonology II: harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine (eds.) The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 27160.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Vaysman, Olga (2009). Segmental alternations and metrical theory. PhD dissertation, MIT. Available as ROA-1011 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel (2000). Yaka nasal harmony: spreading or segmental correspondence? BLS 26. 321332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rachel Walker (2011). Vowel patterns in language. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 130.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. x + 356.
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Rachel Walker (2011). Vowel patterns in language. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 130.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. x + 356.
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Rachel Walker (2011). Vowel patterns in language. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 130.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. x + 356.
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *