Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:37:40.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependency*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Harry van der Hulst
Harry van der Hulst
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article I discuss some aspects of a model of segmental structure, in particular the representation of vowels. The central claim is that vowels can be represented in terms of three unary primitives, organised in a binary structure involving both DOMINANCE and DEPENDENCY relations.

My goal is to explore the consequences of this claim. Certain aspects of the proposal differ in matters of principle from the theory of segmental structure advanced in Chomsky & Halle (1968; henceforth SPE), and subsequent work in this tradition up to and including the ‘geometrical model’ as developed in Steriade (1982), Clements (1985), Sagey (1986), McCarthy (1988) and Halle (1988), even though it is argued in some of these works that certain features are unary, that they are organised hierarchically and that certain features enter into dependency relations.

Type
Thematic Papers
Information
Phonology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , August 1989 , pp. 253 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. & J., Durand (1989). Vowel harmony and non-specification in Nez Perce. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part 2). 1–18.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. & Ewen, C. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. JL 10. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1985). Yokuts harmony: evidence for coplanar representation in nonlinear phonology. LI 16. 335–372.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukema, F. & Coopmans, P. (eds.) (1987). Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. & L., Trigo (1989). Parasitic harmony. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part 2). 19–38.Google Scholar
Coopmans, P. & Hulk, A. (eds.) (1988). Linguistics in the Netherlands 1988. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dikken, M. den & van der Hulst, H. (1989). Segmental hierarchitecture. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part I).Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. (1983). The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donegan, P. (1978). On the natural phonology of vowels. PhD thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ewen, C. & van der Hulst, H. (1985). Single-valued features and the non-linear analysis of vowel harmony. In Bennis, H. & Beukema, F. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1985. Dordrecht: Foris. 39–48.Google Scholar
Ewen, C. & van der Hulst, H. (1987). Single-valued features and the distinction between [-F] and [øF]. In Beukema & Coopmans (1987). 51–60.Google Scholar
Ewen, C. & van der Hulst, H. (1988). [high], [low] and [back] or [I], [A] and [U]. In Coopmans & Hulk (1988). 49–58.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1985). Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian, Yaka, Finnish and Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 2. 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1987). Vowel systems. CLS 23:2. 116–133.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1988). Features. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der (1988). The dual interpretation of |i|, |u| and |a|. NELS 18. 208–222.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der (1989). The geometry of vocalic features. In van der Huist & Smith (1989: part 2). 77–126.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der (ms). Components for vowels and consonants, with special reference to |i|. University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der, Mous, M. & Smith, N. (1986). The autosegmental analysis of reduced vowel harmony systems: the case of Tunen. In Beukema, F. & Hulk, A. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1986. Dordrecht: Foris. 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der & Smith, N. (1985). Vowel harmony in Djingili, Nyangumarda and Warlpiri. Phonology Yearbook 2. 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der & Smith, N. (1986). On neutral vowels. In Bogers, K., van der Hulst, H. G. & Mous, M. (eds.) The representation of suprasegmentals in African languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 233–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der & Smith, N. (1987). Vowel harmony in Khalkha and Buriat (East Mongolian). In Beukema & Coopmans (1987). 81–90.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der & Smith, N. (1988). Tungusic and Mongolian vowel harmony:a minimal pair. In Coopmans & Hulk (1988). 79–88.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der & Smith, N. (eds.) (1989). Features, segmental structure and harmony processes. 2 parts. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Humbert, H. (1989). The three degrees: a paper on the internal structure of vowel segments. Ms, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Itô, J. (1984). Melodic dissimilation in Ainu. LI 15. 505–513.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. C. (1980). Regular disharmony in Kirghiz. In Vago, R. (ed.) Issues in vowel harmony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 201–236.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1988). English stress and destressing as rime adjunction. In Coopmans & Hulk (1988). 111–120.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. (1988). The phonologist's dilemma: a game-theoretic approach to phonological debate. GLOW Newsletter 21. 16–19.Google Scholar
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1988). Konstituentenrektion und Rektion in der Phonologie. In Prinzhorn, M. (ed.) Phonologie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1981). Remarks on the metrical structure of the syllable. In Dressier, W., Pfeiffer, O. & Rennison, J. (eds.) Phonologica 1980. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. 245–256.Google Scholar
Korn, D. (1969). Types of labial harmony in the Turkic languages. Anthropological Linguistics 11. 98–106.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 45. 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mester, A. (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mester, A. (1989). Dependent tier ordering and the OCP. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part 2). 127–144.Google Scholar
Mester, A. & Itô, J. (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. (1986). Some issues in CV phonology with reference to the history of Chinese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 31. 225–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. (1989). Articulator based features of vowels and consonants. Ms, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Rennison, J. (1983). Tridirectional feature systems for vowels. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 33/34. 69–94Google Scholar
Rennison, J. (1986). On tridirectional feature systems for vowels. In Durand, J. (ed.) Dependency and non-tier phonology. London: Croom Helm. 281–303.Google Scholar
Rennison, J. (1987a). On the vowel harmonies of Koromfe (Burkina Faso, West Africa). In Dressier, W., Luschutzky, H., Pfeiffer, O. & Rennison, J. (eds.) Phonologica 1984. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 239–246.Google Scholar
Rennison, J. (1987b). Vowel harmony and tridirectional vowel features. Folia Linguistica 21. 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, J. (1988). Tridirectional autosegmental phonology and the PC. Habilitationschrift, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1989). Degree of closure in complex segments. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part I).Google Scholar
Sanders, G. (1972). The simplex-feature hypothesis. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Schane, S. (1984). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook I. 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, S. (1987). The resolution of hiatus. CLS 23:2. 279–290.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1989). A two-root theory of length. NELS 19.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (1989). An integrated hierarchical system of place features. In van der Hulst & Smith (1989: part I).Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1981). Certain parameters of metrical harmony. GLOW Newsletter 6. 19–21.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Redundant features. CLS 23:2. 339–362.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Translated by Baltaxe, C. (1969) as Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N. (1969).Google Scholar
Review of Burssens, A. (1969). Problemen en inventarisatie van de verbale strukturen in het Dho Alur (Noordoost-Kongo). Brussels: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie.Google Scholar
Journal of African Languages 8. 125–126.Google Scholar
Wescott, R. W. (1965). Review of J. M. C. Thomas (1963). Le parler ngbaka de Bokanga. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lg, 41. 346–347.Google Scholar
Wood, S. (1982). X-ray and model studies of vowel articulation. Working Papers in Linguistics, Lund University 23.Google Scholar