Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:25:54.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compound tensification and laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Yanbian Korean*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Chiyuki Ito
Chiyuki Ito*
Affiliation:
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
*
E-mail: chiyukit@aa.tufs.ac.jp.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Korean compound nouns, the onset of the second element tensifies: /pjəl + picʰ/ → [pjəl.p*icʰ]. This process displays a substantial number of exceptions. We show that in the Yanbian dialect phonological factors influence compound tensification; their influence is confirmed by the results of a wug test. These results mostly mirror generalisations informed by lexical data, but a pattern not clearly observed in the existing lexicon also emerged (analytic bias or ‘overlearning’), while phonologically implausible interactions were not actively incorporated (‘underlearning’). Preliminary acoustic analysis motivates an OCP restriction against multiple laryngeally marked segments, due to the shared feature [long non-modal voicing]. But in simplex nouns the co-occurrence of two tense onsets is overrepresented. This apparent contradiction is explained by a directionality difference: compound tensification is progressive, as opposed to the regressive assimilation of creaky voice from the vowel of the following syllable in simplex words.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 349 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the 7th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, Hiroshima University. I thank three anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of Phonology for their detailed and insightful comments. I am grateful to all of the Yanbian speakers who have provided the data for this study, especially Maylan Kwen and her family for their continuous and enthusiastic support of the data collection.

References

Ahn, Sang-Cheol (1985). The interplay of phonology and morphology in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
An, Pyeonghui (1968). Cwungsey kwuke.uy sokkyek emi ‘-s’ ey tay haye. [On the genitive suffix ‘-s’ in Middle Korean.] In Festschrift for Professor Sungnyeong Lee. Seoul: Ulyu Munhwasa. 337–345.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas M., Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven (2014). Package ‘lme4’: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Version 1.0-6. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael, Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Lg 87. 84–125.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.05). http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, Jun, Sun-Ah & Ladefoged, Peter (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. JPh 30. 193–228.Google Scholar
Choi, Hyenpay (1959). Ulimalpon. [Our grammar.] Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.Google Scholar
Fukui, Rei (1993). Chūki chōsengo-no fukushiin-to nōon-ni tsuite. [On consonant clusters and tense consonants in Middle Korean.] Gaikokugoka Kenkyūkiyō 41. 113–139.Google Scholar
Fukui, Rei (2013). Kankokugo oninshi-no tankyū. [Explorations in Korean historical phonology.] Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2010). Perceptual distinctness and long-distance laryngeal restrictions. Phonology 27. 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2011). Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology – the case for [long VOT]. The Linguistic Review 28. 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2012). Perceptual similarity in non-local laryngeal restrictions. Lingua 122. 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2013). Speaker awareness of non-local laryngeal phonotactics in Cochabamba Quechua. NLLT 31. 1067–1099.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6. 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N. (1971). A note on laryngeal features. MIT Quarterly Progress Report 101. 198–212.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, W. J. (1973). Some observations on the tense-lax distinction in initial stops in Korean. JPh 1. 263–272.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (2009). Maxent grammar tool. Software package. Available at http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/MaxentGrammarTool.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Bretz, Frank, Westfall, Peter, Heiberger, Richard M. & Schuetzenmeister, Andre (2013). Multcomp: simultaneous inference in general parametric models. R package version 1.3-1. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multcomp/index.html.Google Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki (2007). Morpheme structure and co-occurrence restrictions in Korean monosyllabic stems. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 13. 373–394.Google Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki (2013). Korean accent: internal reconstruction and historical development. Korean Linguistics 15. 129–198.Google Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki & Kenstowicz, Michael (2009). Mandarin loanwords in Yanbian Korean I: laryngeal features. Phonological Studies 12. 61–72.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (1998). Markedness and word structure: OCP effects in Japanese. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-255 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Wenhua (2008). Sounds of Chinese Korean: a variationist approach. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Kadowaki, Seiichi, Matsuo, Isamu, Takashima, Yoshirō & Yutani, Yukitoshi (1993). Chōsengo jiten. [Korean–Japanese dictionary.] Tokyo: Shōgakukan.Google Scholar
Kagaya, Ryohei (1974). A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates and fricatives. JPh 2. 161–180.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 317–330.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto, Ono, Hajime & Sudo, Kiyoshi (2006). Consonant co-occurrence restrictions in Yamato Japanese. In Vance, Timothy J. & Jones, Kimberly (eds.) Japanese/Korean linguistics 14. Palo Alto: CLSI. 27–38.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Sano, Shin-ichiro (2014). Identity avoidance and rendaku. In Kingston, John, Moore-Cantwell, Claire, Pater, Joe & Staubs, Robert (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Meeting on Phonology. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America. Available at http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/amphonology.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Park, Chiyoun (2006). Laryngeal features and tone in Kyengsang Korean: a phonetic study. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 12. 247–264.Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu (1965). On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word 21. 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu (1970). Boundary phenomena in Korean. Papers in Linguistics 2. 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, Midam (2004). Correlation between VOT and F0 in the perception of Korean stops and affricates. Interspeech 2004: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Jeju Island, Korea. 49–52.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (1974). Korean consonantal phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kurisu, Kazutaka (2001). The phonology of morpheme realization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Kwuklip kwuke yenkwuwen [National Institute of the Korean Language] (ed.) (1999). Phyocwun kwuke taysacen. [Standard Korean dictionary.] Seoul: Twusantonga.Google Scholar
Labrune, Laurence (1999). Variation intra et inter-langue: morpho-phonologie du rendaku en japonais et du sai-sios en coréen. Cahiers de Grammaire 24. 117–152.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin (1972). Boundary phenomena in Korean revisited. Papers in Linguistics 5. 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyunjung & Jongman, Allard (2012). Effects of tone on the three-way laryngeal distinction in Korean: an acoustic and aerodynamic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42. 145–169.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop & Ramsey, S. Robert (2000). The Korean language. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon (1972). Kwukesa kaysel. [History of the Korean language.] Seoul: Thap Chwulphansa.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S. (1964). A crosslanguage study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422.Google Scholar
Lyman, Benjamin S. (1894). Change from surd to sonant in Japanese compounds. Oriental Studies of the Oriental Club of Philadelphia. 1–17.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
MacEachern, Margaret R. (1999). Laryngeal cooccurrence restrictions. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin (1988). Studies in tier structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83–127.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Kohei (2006). Lyman's law in loanwords. Phonological Studies 9. 83–90.Google Scholar
Nusbaum, Howard C., Pisoni, David B. & Davis, Christopher K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report 10, Indiana University. 357–375.Google Scholar
Oh, Mira & Yang, Hui (2013). The production of stops by Seoul and Yanbian Korean speakers. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences 5:4. 185–193.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Silva, David J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 23. 287–308.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (1980). The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation. Linguistics 18. 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Mary Ann (2007). Repetition avoidance in human language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew (2002). Phonological alternation, lexical neighborhood density and markedness in processing. Paper presented at the 8th Conference on Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon 8), Yale University.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2003). Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. WCCFL 22. 533–546.Google Scholar
Yun, Sung Kyu (2006). Epenthetic s in compound nouns. English Linguistic Science 16. 1–13.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie & Lai, Yuwen (2008). Phonological knowledge beyond the lexicon in Taiwanese double reduplication. WCCFL 27. 458–466.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2011). Predicting Korean sai-siot: phonological and non-phonological factors. Handout from paper presented at the 21st Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ito supplementary material

Ito supplementary material 1

Download Ito supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 749.5 KB