Anttila, Arto (1997). Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Anttila, Arto & Cho, Young-mee Yu (1998). Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104. 31–56.
Bernhardt, Barbara H. & Stemberger, Joseph P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
Boersma, Paul (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 43–58.
Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma, Paul (1999). Optimality-Theoretic learning in the Praat program. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 23. 17–35.
Boersma, Paul (2009). Some correct error-driven versions of the Constraint Demotion Algorithm. LI 40. 667–686.
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 45–86.
Boersma, Paul & Levelt, Clara C. (2000). Gradual constraint-ranking learning algorithm predicts acquisition order. In Clark, Eve V. (ed.) Proceedings of the 30th Child Language Research Forum. Stanford: CSLI. 229–237.
Boersma, Paul & Pater, Joe (to appear). Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe (eds.) Harmonic Grammar and harmonic serialism. London: Equinox.
Cesa-Bianchi, Nicolò & Lugosi, Gábor (2006). Prediction, learning, and games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.
Compton, A. J. & Streeter, M. (1977). Child phonology: data collection and preliminary analyses. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 13. 99–109.
Davidson, Lisa, Jusczyk, Peter W. & Smolensky, Paul (2004). The initial and final states: theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base. In Kager et al. (2004). 321–368.
Dresher, B. Elan (1999). Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. LI 30. 27–67.
Fikkert, Paula & de Hoop, Helen (2009). Language acquisition in optimality theory. Linguistics 47. 311–357.
Gnanadesikan, Amalia (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager et al. (2004). 73–108.
Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles (1998). Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. LI 29. 656–683.
Hayes, Bruce (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. In Kager et al. (2004). 158–203.
Heinz, Jeffrey & Riggle, Jason (2011). Learnability. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 54–78.
Jesney, Karen & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2007). Re-evaluating learning biases in Harmonic Grammar. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 36. 69–110.
Jesney, Karen & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2009). Gradual learning and faithfulness: consequences of ranked vs. weighted constraints. NELS 38. 375–388.
Jusczyk, Peter W., Friederici, Angela D., Wessels, Jeanine M. I., Svenkerud, Vigdis Y. & Jusczyk, Ann Marie (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language 32. 402–420.
Jusczyk, Peter W., Smolensky, Paul & Allocco, Theresa (2002). How English-learning infants respond to markedness and faithfulness constraints. Language Acquisition 10. 31–73.
Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, Frank & Asudeh, Ash (2002). Probabilistic learning algorithms and Optimality Theory. LI 33. 225–244.
Kivinen, Jyrki (2003). Online learning of linear classifiers. In Mendelson, Shahar & Smola, Alexander J. (eds.) Advanced lectures on machine learning. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. 235–257.
Legendre, Géraldine, Miyata, Yoshiro & Smolensky, Paul (1990a). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: an application. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 884–891.
Legendre, Géraldine, Miyata, Yoshiro & Smolensky, Paul (1990b). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: theoretical foundations. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 388–395.
Levelt, Clara C., Schiller, Niels O. & Levelt, Willem J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition 8. 237–264.
Lombardi, Linda (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. NLLT 17. 267–302.
McLeod, Sharynne, Doorn, Jan van & Reed, Vicki A. (2001). Normal acquisition of consonant clusters. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10. 99–110.
Magri, Giorgio (2009). A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures: constraint promotion for Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Magri, Giorgio (2010). Complexity of the acquisition of phonotactics in Optimality Theory. In Heinz, Jeffrey, Cahill, Lynne & Wicentowski, Richard (eds.) SIGMORPHON 2010: 11th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology. Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics. 19–27.
Magri, Giorgio (2011). An online model of the acquisition of phonotactics within Optimality Theory. In Carlson, Laura, Hölscher, Christoph & Shipley, Thomas F. (eds.) Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society. 2012–2017.
Magri, Giorgio (2012a). Convergence of error-driven ranking algorithms: extension to the stochastic case. Ms, LFF, CNRS/Université Paris 7.
Magri, Giorgio (2012b). Restrictiveness of error-driven ranking algorithms: an initial assessment. Ms, LFF, CNRS/Université Paris 7.
Magri, Giorgio (2012c). A note on the GLA's choice of the current loser from the perspective of factorizability. Ms, LFF, CNRS/Université Paris 7.
Magri, Giorgio (to appear a). Complexity of the acquisition of phonotactics in Optimality Theory. LI. Earlier version available as ROA-1138 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Magri, Giorgio (to appear b). HG has no computational advantages over OT: towards a new toolkit for Computational OT. LI.
Pater, Joe (2008). Gradual learning and convergence. LI 39. 334–345.
Pater, Joe (2009). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33. 1–37.
Pater, Joe & Barlow, Jessica A. (2003). Constraint conflict in cluster reduction. Journal of Child Language 30. 487–526.
Prince, Alan (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-500 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Prince, Alan & Tesar, Bruce (2004). Learning phonotactic distributions. In Kager et al. (2004). 245–291.
Riggle, Jason (2009). The complexity of ranking hypotheses in Optimality Theory. Computational Linguistics 35. 47–59.
Smit, Ann Bosma, Hand, Linda, Freilinger, J. Joseph, Bernthal, John E. & Bird, Ann (1990). The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 55. 779–798.
Smolensky, Paul (1996a). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. LI 27. 720–731.
Smolensky, Paul (1996b). The initial state and ‘Richness of the Base’ in Optimality Theory. Ms, Johns Hopkins University. Available as ROA-154 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Stemberger, Joseph P. & Bernhardt, Barbara H. (1999). The emergence of faithfulness. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.) Emergence of language. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 417–446.
Stemberger, Joseph P. & Bernhardt, Barbara H. (2001). U-shaped learning in language acquisition, and restrictions on error correction. Available as ROA-472 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Stemberger, Joseph P., Bernhardt, Barbara H. & Johnson, Carolyn (2001). U-shaped learning in phonological development. Available as ROA-471 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Tesar, Bruce (1995). Computational Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. Available as ROA-90 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Tesar, Bruce (1998). Error-driven learning in Optimality Theory via the efficient computation of optimal forms. In Barbosa, Pilar, Fox, Danny, Hagstrom, Paul, McGinnis, Martha & Pesetsky, David (eds.) Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 421–435.
Tesar, Bruce (2004). Using inconsistency detection to overcome structural ambiguity. LI 35. 219–253.
Tesar, Bruce (2008). Output-driven maps. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-956 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (1996). Learnability in Optimality Theory (long version). Baltimore: Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University.
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. LI 29. 229–268.
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2009). Frequency of violation and constraint-based phonological learning. Lingua 119. 6–38.
Wexler, Kenneth & Culicover, Peter W. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Zamuner, Tania S., Gerken, LouAnn & Hammond, Michael (2005). The acquisition of phonology based on input: a closer look at the relation of cross-linguistic and child language data. Lingua 115. 1329–1474.