Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:28:04.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Larry M. Hyman andFrans Plank (eds.) (2018). Phonological typology. (Phonology and Phonetics 23.) Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. ix + 434.

Review products

Larry M. Hyman andFrans Plank (eds.) (2018). Phonological typology. (Phonology and Phonetics 23.) Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. ix + 434.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Yuni Kim
Yuni Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 537 - 542
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

E-mail: y.kim@essex.ac.uk.

References

Bickel, Balthasar (2007). Typology in the 21st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11. 239–251.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul V. (2017). Review of Gordon (2016). Lg 93. 481–484.Google Scholar
Easterday, Shelece (2017). Highly complex syllable structure: a typological study of its phonological characteristics and diachronic development. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew K. (2016). Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2013). Review of Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. Phonology 30. 173–179.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie (2007). The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Harnad, Stevan (2005). To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization. In Cohen, Henri & Lefebvre, Claire (eds.) Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 19–43.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff (2008). The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83–127.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis & Jeon, Hae-Sung (2014). Speech rhythm: a metaphor? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0396.Google Scholar
Round, Erich R. (2017). Review of Gordon (2016). Folia Linguistica 51. 745–755.Google Scholar