Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:54:23.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nishnaabemwin restructuring controversy: new empirical evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2019

Dustin Bowers
Dustin Bowers*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
*
E-mail: bowersd@email.arizona.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The categorical deletion of unstressed vowels from iterative feet differentiates serial theories of phonology from parallel theories. Of at least equal importance is whether language learners acquire rhythmic syncope. A potentially illustrative case comes from the recent development of Nishnaabemwin (Algonquian), which extended unstressed vowel reduction until it approximated categorical rhythmic syncope. In response, an entire generational cohort reportedly carried out a dramatic restructuring by innovating a novel set of person prefixes and losing the surface alternations. However, the original reports are subject to some dispute. To shed further light on the status of rhythmic syncope in Modern Nishnaabemwin, this paper details three surveys of the first cohort of speakers born during the near-syncope period. The surveys indicate that, despite familiarity with the original system, the entire generational cohort uniformly adopted the innovative system.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 187 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For their helpful feedback, I would like to thank Bruce Hayes, Rand Valentine, Kie Zuraw, three anonymous reviewers and participants in the UCLA phonology seminar, as well as audiences at the 44th Algonquian Conference, CLS 48, WCCFL 35, the University of Southern California, the University of Alberta and Yale University. Alan Corbiere, Mary Ann Corbiere and Reta Sands-Clement were also instrumental in this project. This work was partially supported by a grant to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

Albright, Adam & Hayes, Bruce (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119–161.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.) Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 35–68.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Benjamin M. & Walker, Steven C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2007). Diachronic phonology. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 497–517.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2015). Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Honeybone, Patrick & Salmons, Joseph C. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 374–399.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard (1938). My Chippewa transcription, impressionistic and ‘systematized’ (i.e. quasi-phonemicized by snap judgement inspection), corrected by Leonard Bloomfield. Leonard Bloomfield papers collection. (Folder B: Bloch–Ojibwa.) Washington, D.C.: National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural HistoryGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1957). Eastern Ojibwa: grammatical sketch, texts and word list. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev (2006). Constraints on phonological interactions. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 43–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 45–86.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Pater, Joe (2016). Convergence properties of a Gradual Learning Algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe (eds.) Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism. London: Equinox. 389–434.Google Scholar
Bowers, Dustin (2012). Phonological restructuring in Odawa. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bowers, Dustin (2015). A system for morphophonological learning and its consequences for language change. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bowers, Dustin & Hao, Yiding (2018). The formal complexity of rhythmic syncope. Ms, University of Arizona & Yale University. Available (February 2019) at https://959bedf0-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/dustinbowerslinguist/papers/BowersHao18Complexity.pdf.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Stevens, Michaël, Mandera, Paweł & Keuleers, Emmanuel (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant's age. Frontiers in Psychology 7:1116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbiere, Mary Ann & Randolph Valentine, J. (2016). Nishnaabemwin: Odawa and Eastern Ojibwe online dictionary. Available (February 2019) at https://dictionary.nishnaabemwin.atlas-ling.ca.Google Scholar
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Spenader, Jennifer, Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111–120.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth (1973). Deep–surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: an Australian example. In Sebeok, Thomas (ed.) Current trends in linguistics. Vol. 11. The Hague: Mouton. 401–458.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth (1991). Remarks on G. Sanders ‘levelling in the history of Polynesian passive formations’. Journal of the Polynesian Society 100. 99–101.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer B., Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Walker, Abby J. & LaShell, Patrick (2015). Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition 139. 83–91.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (1939). A descriptive grammar of the Potawatomi language. PhD thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (1948). Potawatomi I: phonemics, morphophonemics, and morphological survey. IJAL 14. 1–10.Google Scholar
Jones, David J. (1971). Odawa noun morphology. In Kaye, Jonathan, Piggott, Glyne L. & Tokaichi, Kensuke (eds.) Odawa language project: first report. Toronto: Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto. 39–79.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1997). Rhythmic vowel deletion in Optimality Theory. In Roca, Iggy (ed.) Derivations and constraints in phonology. Oxford: Clarendon. 463–499.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan (1974). Morpheme Structure Constraints live! Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 55–62.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Hunter T. (2017). How the Potawatomi language lives: a grammar of Potawatomi. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2008). The serial interaction of stress and syncope. NLLT 26. 499–546.Google Scholar
Nichols, John D. (2015). The Ojibwe people's dictionary. Available (February 2019) at https://ojibwe.lib.umn.edu.Google Scholar
Nichols, John D. & Nyholm, Earl (1995). A concise dictionary of Minnesota Ojibwe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1989). Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Breivik, Leiv Egil & Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.) Language change: contributions to the study of its causes. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 173–198.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1992). What's cognitive, what's not, in sound change. In Kellermann, Günter & Morrissey, Michael D. (eds.) Diachrony within synchrony: language and cognition. Frankfurt: Lang. 309–355.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.) Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London & New York: Longman. 237–278.Google Scholar
Piggott, Glyne L. (1980). Aspects of Odawa morphophonemics. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Piggott, Glyne L. (1983). Extrametricality and Ojibwa stress. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 80–117.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. (1975). A preliminary report on the dialects of Eastern Ojibwa-Odawa. In Cowan, William (ed.) Papers of the 7th Algonquian Conference. Ottawa: Carleton University. 130–156.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. (1976). The morphosyntax of the Central Ojibwa verb. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. (1985a). Eastern Ojibwa–Chippewa–Ottawa dictionary. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. (1985b). Lexicography and Ojibwa vowel deletion. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30. 453–471.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. (1996). Relative clauses in Ottawa. Paper presented at the 28th Algonquian Conference, Toronto.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard A. & Buszard-Welcher, Laura (1996). An intruder in a sugar camp is beaten off. In Nichols, John D. & Ogg, Arden C. (eds.) nikotwâsik iskwâhtêm, pâskihtêpayih! Studies in honour of H. C. Wolfart. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics. 355–366.Google Scholar
Symonds, Matthew R. E. & Moussalli, Adnan (2011). A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65. 13–21.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. Randolph (1994). Ojibwe dialect relationships. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. Randolph (2001). Nishnaabemwin reference grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar