Skip to main content
×
×
Home

On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory*

  • Andreas Baumann (a1) and Nikolaus Ritt (a1)
Abstract

This paper accounts for stress-pattern diversity in languages such as English, where words that are otherwise equivalent in terms of phonotactic structure and morphosyntactic category can take both initial and final stress, as seen in ˈlentilhoˈtel, ˈenvoydeˈgree, ˈresearch Nreˈsearch N and ˈaccess Vacˈcess V. Addressing the problem in general and abstract terms, we identify systematic conditions under which stress-pattern diversity becomes stable. We hypothesise that words adopt stress patterns that produce, on average, the best possible phrase-level rhythm. We model this hypothesis in evolutionary game theory, predict that stress-pattern diversity among polysyllabic word forms depends on the frequency of monosyllables and demonstrate how that prediction is met both in Present-Day English and in its history.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory*
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: andreas.baumann@univie.ac.at, nikolaus.ritt@univie.ac.at.
Footnotes
Hide All
*

For constructive comments on earlier versions of this paper we owe thanks to Donka Minkova, Elan Dresher, Heinz Giegerich, Kenny Smith and Simon Kirby, three anonymous reviewers and the editors of Phonology. Obviously, any remaining errors are ours.

The appendices mentioned in the paper are available as online supplementary materials at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675717000240.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Altmann Eduardo G., Pierrehumbert Janet B. & Motter Adilson E. (2009). Beyond word frequency: bursts, lulls, and scaling in the temporal distributions of words. PLoS ONE 4. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007678.
Anderson John M. (1986). Suprasegmental dependencies. In Durand Jacques (ed.) Dependency and non-linear phonology. London: Croom Helm. 55133.
Attridge Derek (1982). The rhythms of English poetry. London & New York: Longman.
Baayen R. Harold, Piepenbrock Richard & Gulikers Leon (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/ldc96l14.
Baxter Gareth J., Blythe Richard A., Croft William & McKane Alan J. (2009). Modeling language change: an evaluation of Trudgill's theory of the emergence of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 21. 257296.
Blevins Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boer Bart de (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. JPh 28. 441465.
Boer Bart de (2002). Evolving sound systems. In Cangelosi Angelo & Parisi Dominic (eds.) Simulating the evolution of language. London: Springer. 7997.
Brighton Henry, Smith Kenny & Kirby Simon (2005). Language as an evolutionary system. Physics of Life Reviews 2. 177226.
Burzio Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee Joan (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee Joan, Chakraborti Paromita, Jung Dagmar & Scheibman Joanne (1998). Prosody and segmental effect: some paths of evolution for word stress. Studies in Language 22. 267314.
Chomsky Noam & Halle Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Christiansen Morten H. & Chater Nick (2008a). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31. 489509.
Christiansen Morten H. & Chater Nick (2008b). Brains, genes, and language evolution: a new synthesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31. 537558.
Croft William (2000). Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Dawkins Richard (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett Daniel C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Domahs Ulrike, Plag Ingo & Carroll Rebecca (2014). Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17. 5996.
Donegan Patricia J. & Stampe David (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126173.
Donegan Patricia J. & Stampe David (1983). Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In Richardson John F., Marks Mitchell & Chukerman Amy (eds.) Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 337353.
Donegan Patricia J. & Stampe David (2009). Hypotheses of Natural Phonology. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45. 131.
Dresher B. Elan & Lahiri Aditi (2005). Main stress left in Early Middle English. In Fortescue Michael, Jensen Eva Skafte, Mogensen Jens Erik & Schøsler Lene (eds.) Historical linguistics 2003: selected papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen, 11–15 August 2003. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 7585.
Dresher B. Elan & Lahiri Aditi (2015). Romance loanwords and stress shift in English: a quantitative approach. Paper presented at the 2nd Edinburgh Symposium on Historical Phonology, University of Edinburgh. Available (August 2017) at http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~dresher/talks/Dresher-Lahiri-ESohPh_talk_pub.pdf.
Dressler Wolfgang U. (1985). Morphonology: the dynamics of derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk Katarzyna (2009). NP extension: B&B phonotactics. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45. 5571.
Fitch W. Tecumseh (2013). Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7:68. 116.
Fullwood Michelle A. (2014). Asymmetric correlations between English verb transitivity and stress. BLS 40. 125138.
Giegerich Heinz J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halle Morris (1998). The stress of English words 1968–1998. LI 29. 539568.
Hay Jessica S. F. & Diehl Randy L. (2007). Perception of rhythmic grouping: testing the iambic/trochaic law. Perception and Psychophysics 69. 113122.
Hayes Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LI 13. 227276.
Hayes Bruce (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. LI 15. 3374.
Hofbauer Josef & Sigmund Karl (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton John (1998). Stress in Old English, giet ongean . Linguistics 36. 847885.
Hyde Brett (2007). Non-finality and weight-sensitivity. Phonology 24. 287334.
Hyde Brett (2011). Extrametricality and non-finality. In van Oostendorp Marc, Ewen Colin J., Hume Elizabeth & Rice Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 10271051.
Jäger Gerhard (2008). Applications of game theory in linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2. 406421.
Jäger Gerhard & Rosenbach Anette (2008). Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics 34:2. 85113.
Jespersen Otto (1912). Growth and structure of the English language. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Teubner.
Jespersen Otto (1928). Monosyllabism in English. Proceedings of the British Academy 14. 341368.
Kager René (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kager René (2005). The factorial typology of rhythmic licensing constraints. Phonological Studies 5. 147155.
Kelly Michael H. (1988). Rhythmic alternation and lexical stress differences in English. Cognition 30. 107137.
Kelly Michael H. (1989). Rhythm and language change in English. Journal of Memory and Language 28. 690710.
Kiparsky Paul (1966). Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7. 6998.
Kiparsky Paul (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LI 10. 421441.
Lass Roger (1992). Phonology and morphology. In Blake Norman (ed.) The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23155.
Lass Roger (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee Ming-Wei & Gibbons Julie (2007). Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding. Cognition 105. 446456.
Liberman Mark & Prince Alan (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249336.
Maynard Smith J. & Price G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246. 1518.
McCrohon Luke (2012). The two-stage life cycle of cultural replicators. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 9. 149170.
McMahon April M. S. & McMahon Robert (2013). Evolutionary linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minkova Donka (1997). Constraint ranking in Middle English stress-shifting. English Language and Linguistics 1. 135175.
Mitchener W. Garrett (2003). Bifurcation analysis of the fully symmetric language dynamical equation. Journal of Mathematical Biology 46. 265285.
Mitchener W. Garrett & Nowak Martin A. (2004). Chaos and language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271. 701704.
Mühlenbernd Roland & Wahle Johannes (2016). Self-organization in sound systems: a model of sound strings processing agents. In Roberts Séan, Cuskley Christine, McCrohon Luke, Barceló-Coblijn Lluís, Feher Olga & Verhoef Tessa (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Evolution of Language. Available (August 2017) at http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/42.html.
Niyogi Partha (2006). The computational nature of language learning and evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Nowak Martin A. (2000). The basic reproductive ratio of a word, the maximum size of a lexicon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204. 179189.
Nowak Martin A. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Belknap.
Nowak Martin A. & Komarova Natalia L. (2001). Towards an evolutionary theory of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5. 288295.
Nowak Martin A., Komarova Natalia L. & Niyogi Partha (2002). Computational and evolutionary aspects of language. Nature 417. 611617.
Nowak Martin A., Plotkin Joshua B. & Jansen Vincent A. A. (2000). The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404. 495498.
Oostendorp Marc van (2005). Stress and metrical structure. Available (August 2017) at http://www.vanoostendorp.nl/pdf/051115.pdf.
Paul Hermann (1920). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
Pierrehumbert Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee Joan & Hopper Paul (eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 137157.
Pierrehumbert Janet B. (2012). The dynamic lexicon. In Cohn Abigail C., Fougeron Cécile & Huffman Marie K. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 173183.
Ritt Nikolaus (2004). Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: a Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritt Nikolaus (2012). Middle English phonology in the digital age: what written corpora can tell us about sound change. In Nevalainen Terttu & Traugott Elizabeth Closs (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 8186.
Ross Don (2016). Game theory. In Zalta Edward N. (ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy archive (Winter 2016 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/game-theory.
Schane Sanford (2007). Understanding English word accentuation. Language Sciences 29. 372384.
Schlüter Julia (2005). Rhythmic grammar: the influence of rhythm on grammatical variation and change in English. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sherman Donald (1975). Noun-verb stress alternation: an example of the lexical diffusion of sound change in English. Linguistics 13. 4372.
Smith John Maynard (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith Kenny & Kirby Simon (2008). Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B 363. 35913603.
Solé Ricard V. (2011). Phase transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sonderegger Morgan & Niyogi Partha (2010). Combining data and mathematical models of language change. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1019–1029.
Sonderegger Morgan & Niyogi Partha (2013). Variation and change in English noun/verb pair stress: data and dynamical systems models. In Yu Alan C. L. (ed.) Origins of sound change: approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 262284.
Stampe David (1979). A dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York: Garland.
Tallerman Maggie & Gibson Kathleen R. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vennemann Theo (1986). Neuere Entwicklungen in der Phonologie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wang William S.-Y., Ke Jinyun & Minett James W. (2004). Computational studies of language evolution. In Huang Chu-Ren & Lenders Winfried (eds.) Computational linguistics and beyond. Taiwan: Academia Sinica. 65108.
Wedel Andrew (2006). Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23. 247274.
Wedel Andrew (2009). Resolving pattern conflict: variation and selection in phonology and morphology. In Blevins James P. & Blevins Juliette (eds.) Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 83100.
Wolfram Research, Inc. (2016). Mathematica. Version 11.0. Software package. Champaign, Ill. http://www.wolfram.com/support.
Yang Charles D. (2000). Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12. 231250.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Baumann and Ritt supplementary material
Appendices A-B

 PDF (219 KB)
219 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 67 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 159 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th December 2017 - 19th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.