Skip to main content

On the universality of intonational phrases: a cross-linguistic interrater study

  • Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (a1), Meytal Sandler (a1), Jan Strunk (a1) and Volker Unterladstetter (a1)

This study is concerned with the identifiability of intonational phrase boundaries across familiar and unfamiliar languages. Four annotators segmented a corpus of more than three hours of spontaneous speech into intonational phrases. The corpus included narratives in their native German, but also in three languages of Indonesia unknown to them. The results show significant agreement across the whole corpus, as well as for each subcorpus. We discuss the interpretation of these results, including the hypothesis that it makes sense to distinguish between phonetic and phonological intonational phrases, and that the former are a universal characteristic of speech, allowing listeners to segment speech into intonational phrase-sized units even in unknown languages.

Corresponding author
Hide All

We are very grateful to four anonymous reviewers for Phonology, the associate editor, Bob Ladd, and the editors for extensive, detailed and constructive comments, questions and suggestions, which have led to major revisions. We also thank the members of the Cologne Phonetics Colloquium for helpful discussion of the first draft of this paper. We owe a very big thanks to the many students and colleagues who participated in the transcription and segmentation of the recordings analysed here.

Authors' contributions: NPH: overall design of study and paper, main author of §1, §2, §6 and §7, final revision of all other sections; MS: contributor to interrater study (including recordings), main administrator of interrater study; JS: statistical analyses, draft of §4 and §5, contributor to interrater study; VU: draft of §3, contributor to interrater study (including recordings). All authors contributed to the consensus version.

Research for this paper was funded by grant 01UG1240A from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) to Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. We are also grateful for funding from the Volkswagen Foundation, which from 2002 to 2016 supported the compilation of the West Papuan corpora used here. See Appendix B for details.

The appendices are available as online supplementary materials at

Hide All
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.4.09).
Breen, Mara, Dilley, Laura C., Kraemer, John & Gibson, Edward (2012). Inter-transcriber reliability for two systems of prosodic annotation: ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) and RaP (Rhythm and Pitch). Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8. 277312.
Buhmann, Jeska, Caspers, Johanneke, van Heuven, Vincent J., Hoekstra, Heleen, Martens, Jean-Pierre & Swerts, Marc (2002). Annotation of prominent words, prosodic boundaries and segmental lengthening by non-expert transcribers in the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In Rodríguez, Manuel González & Arauj, Carmen Paz Suarez (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Paris: Evaluations and Language Resources Distribution Agency. 779–785.
Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.) (1980). The pear stories: cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, Wallace L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, Jennifer, Mo, Yoonsook & Baek, Soondo (2010). The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 25. 11411177.
Cole, Jennifer, Mo, Yoonsook & Hasegawa-Johnson, Mark (2010). Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence. Laboratory Phonology 1. 425452.
Cole, Jennifer & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2016). New methods for prosodic transcription: capturing variability as a source of information. Laboratory Phonology 7. 129.
Dilley, Laura C. & Brown, Meredith (2005). The RaP (Rhythm and Pitch) labeling system. Available (February 2018) at
Fletcher, Janet (2010). The prosody of speech: timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.) The handbook of phonetic sciences. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 523602.
Fox, John (2003). Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 8. 127. Available at
Frazier, Lyn, Carlson, Katy & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 244249.
Frota, Sónia (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland.
Goldman Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. London & New York: Academic Press.
Grice, Martine, Baumann, Stefan & Benzmuller, Ralf (2005). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Jun (2005). 55–83.
Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Hart, Johan ’t, Collier, René & Cohen, Antonie (1990). A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin (2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Lg 86. 663687.
Heeschen, Volker (1992). A dictionary of the Yale (Kosarek) language (with sketch of grammar and English index). Berlin: Reimer.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (2010). Notes on Waima'a intonation. In Ewing, Michael & Klamer, Marian (eds.) East Nusantara: typological and areal analyses. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 4769.
Hyman, Larry M. (2015). Does Gokana really have syllables? A postscript. Phonology 32. 303306.
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2014). Prosodic typology II: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamholz, David C. (2014). Austronesians in Papua: diversification and change in South Halmahera-West New Guinea. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Katsika, Argyro, Krivokapić, Jelena, Mooshammer, Christine, Tiede, Mark & Goldstein, Louis (2014). The coordination of boundary tones and its interaction with prominence. JPh 44. 6282.
Krivokapić, Jelena (2007). The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Krivokapić, Jelena (2014). Gestural coordination at prosodic boundaries and its role for prosodic structure and speech planning processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369.
Krivokapić, Jelena & Byrd, Dani (2012). Prosodic boundary strength: an articulatory and perceptual study. JPh 40. 430442.
Ladd, D. Robert (1986). Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3. 311340.
Ladd, D. Robert (2008). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landis, J. Richard & Koch, Gary G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33. 159174.
Langus, Alan, Marchetto, Erika, Bion, Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann & Nespor, Marina (2012). Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech? Journal of Memory and Language 66. 285306.
Lazard, Gilbert (2002). Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica 36. 141190.
Levelt, Willem J. M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Li, Weijun, Wang, Lin, Li, Xiaqing & Yang, Yufang (2008). Closure positive shifts evoked by different prosodic boundaries in Chinese sentences. In Wang, Rubin, Shen, Enhua & Gu, Fanji (eds.) Advances in cognitive neurodynamics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics 2007. Dordrecht: Springer. 505–509.
Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Gussenhoven, Carlos (2016). No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: the case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33. 353389.
Mo, Yoonsook, Cole, Jennifer & Lee, Eun-Kyung (2008). Naïve listeners’ prominence and boundary perception. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody. Campinas, Brazil. 735–738. Available (February 2018) at
Pijper, Jan Roelof de & Sanderman, Angelien A. (1994). On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. JASA 96. 20372047.
Pitrelli, John F., Beckman, Mary E. & Hirschberg, Julia (1994). Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94). Yokohama: Acoustical Society of Japan. 123–126.
R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Remijsen, Bert (2001). Word-prosodic systems of Raja Ampat languages. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Remijsen, Bert & van Heuven, Vincent J. (2005). Stress, tone and discourse prominence in the Curaçao dialect of Papiamentu. Phonology 22. 205235.
Riesberg, Sonja (2017). An introduction to the Yali-German dictionary with a short grammatical sketch. In Zöllner, Siegfried, Zöllner, Ilse & Riesberg, Sonja (eds.) A Yali (Angguruk) – German dictionary. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics. 143. Available at
Riesberg, Sonja, Kalbertodt, Janina, Baumann, Stefan & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (2018). On the perception of prosodic prominences and boundaries in Papuan Malay. In Riesberg, Sonja, Shiohara, Asako & Utsumi, Atsuko (eds.) Perspectives on information structure in Austronesian languages. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Sanderman, Angelien A. (1996). Prosodic phrasing: production, perception, acceptability and comprehension. PhD dissertation, University of Eindhoven.
Sanderman, Angelien A. & Collier, René (1997). Prosodic phrasing and comprehension. Language and Speech 40. 391409.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Turk, Alice (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25. 193247.
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary E., Pitrelli, John, Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Hirschberg, Julia (1992). ToBI: a standard for labeling English prosody. In Ohala, John J., Nearey, Terrance M., Derwing, Bruce L., Hodge, Megan M. & Wiebe, Grace E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Edmonton: University of Alberta. 867870.
Soto, Victor, Cooper, Erica, Rosenberg, Andrew & Hirschberg, Julia (2013). Cross-language phrase boundary detection. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.
Steinhauer, Karsten, Alter, Kai & Friederici, Angela D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2. 191196.
Stoel, Ruben B. (2007). The intonation of Manado Malay. In van Heuven, Vincent J. & van Zanten, Ellen (eds.) Prosody in Indonesian languages. Utrecht: LOT. 117150.
Streefkerk, Barbertje M. (2002). Prominence: acoustic and lexical/syntactic correlates. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Tokizaki, Hisao (2002). Prosodic hierarchy and prosodic boundary. Bunka-to Gengo 56. 8199.
Wagner, Michael (2010). Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. NLLT 28. 183237.
Wagner, Michael & Watson, Duane G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 25. 905945.
Yoon, Tae-Jin, Chavarría, Sandra, Cole, Jennifer & Hasegawa-Johnson, Mark (2004). Intertranscriber reliability of prosodic labeling on telephone conversation using ToBI. Interspeech 2004: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Jeju Island, Korea. 2729–2732. Available (February 2018) at
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Himmelmann et al. supplementary material
Himmelmann et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (115 KB)
115 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 39 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 146 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 1st June 2018 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.