Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:29:29.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Smolensky and Géraldine Legendre (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Vol. 1: Cognitive architecture. Pp. xxiv+563. Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications. Pp. xxiv+611.

Review products

Paul Smolensky and Géraldine Legendre (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Vol. 1: Cognitive architecture. Pp. xxiv+563. Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications. Pp. xxiv+611.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2009

Joe Pater
Joe Pater
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 217 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric (2000). Harmony, dominance, and control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer & Kisseberth, Charles (1995). An optimal domains theory of harmony. Ms, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (ed.) (1993). The last phonological rule: reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Spenador, Jennifer, Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111–120.Google Scholar
Bruce, Hayes, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1988, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1998). Markedness and word structure: OCP effects in Japanese. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
René, Kager, Hulst, Harry van der & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) (1999). The prosody–morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaun, Abigail R. (2004). The typology of rounding harmony. In Hayes et al. (2004). 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2006). A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: the case of [+voice] in Japanese. Lg 82. 536–574.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1991). Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Łubowicz, Anna (2002). Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua 112. 243–280.Google Scholar
Łubowicz, Anna (2005). Locality of conjunction. WCCFL 24. 254–262.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16. 331–399.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2002). A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). Comparative markedness. Theoretical Linguistics 29. 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2004). Headed spans and autosegmental spreading. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-685 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1999). Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In Kager et al. (1999). 218–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Smolensky, Paul (2002). Typological consequences of local constraint conjunction. WCCFL 21. 306–319.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2002). Constraint conjunction versus grounded constraint subhierarchies in Optimality Theory. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-530 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (1999). Austronesian nasal substitution and other N effects. In Kager et al. (1999). 310–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe (to appear). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Potts, Chris, Pater, Joe, Jesney, Karen, Bhatt, Rajesh & Becker, Michael (2009). Harmonic Grammar with Linear Programming: from linguistic systems to linguistic typology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (2002). Anything goes. In Honma, Takeru, Okazaki, Masao, Tabata, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Shin-ichi (eds.) A new century of phonology and phonological theory: a Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 66–90.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, John (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 114–174.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 3. 25–145.Google Scholar
Wolf, Matthew (2008). Optimal interleaving: serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar