Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The phonologisation of redundancy: length and quality in Welsh vowels*

  • Pavel Iosad (a1)

‘Phonologisation’ is a process whereby a phonetic phenomenon enters the phonological grammar and becomes conceptualised as the result of categorical manipulation of phonological symbols. I analyse the phonologisation of a predictable phonological pattern in Welsh, with particular attention to identifying criteria for whether phonologisation has occurred. I argue for a model where phonologisation experiences bottom-up and top-down biases. From the bottom up, there is pressure to phonologise phenomena with a categorical distribution; from the top down, there exist formal constraints on featural specification. I focus on the requirement for featural specifications to obey the Contrastivist Hypothesis, which denies that redundant features can be involved in phonological computation, in the context of a framework with emergent features. I suggest that the Contrastivist Hypothesis provides a useful boundary condition for emergent-feature theories, whilst independent phonologisation criteria provide contrastivist approaches with a more solid conceptual underpinning.

Corresponding author
Hide All

Portions of this paper were presented at the 1st Edinburgh Symposium on Historical Phonology, the Edinburgh P-workshop, the GLOW workshop on Phonological Specification and Interface Interpretation (Brussels), the 8th North American Phonology Conference (Montreal), the 21st and 22nd Welsh Linguistics Seminars (Gregynog), the 1st Conference on Linguistic Diversity in Wales (Aberystwyth) and the 24th Manchester Phonology Meeting. Thanks to the audiences at these forums for questions and comments, particularly Gwen Awbery, Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, Josef Fruehwald, Daniel Currie Hall and Michaela Hejná. For help with fieldwork, thanks to Christine Jones and Mererid Hopwood (University of Wales Trinity Saint David) and Diarmuid Johnson (Menter Rhos-y-Gilwen). At Phonology, a huge thanks to three anonymous reviewers, an anonymous associate editor and the editors for numerous questions and suggestions that have immeasurably improved the paper. All errors of fact or interpretation remain entirely mine.

The appendices referred to in the paper are available as online supplementary materials at

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Patti Adank , Roel Smits & Roeland van Hout (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. JASA 116. 30993107.

Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.) The morphology and phonology of exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 883.

Kenneth P. Burnham & David R. Anderson (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 33. 261304.

Patrik Bye & Paul de Lacy (2008). Metrical influences on fortition and lenition. In Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho , Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds.) Lenition and fortition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 173206.

Elizabeth Cowper & Daniel Currie Hall (2014). ReductiË ad discr~men: where features come from. Nordlyd 41. 145164.

B. Elan Dresher (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

B. Elan Dresher (2014). The arch not the stones: universal feature theory without universal features. Nordlyd 41. 165181.

Ewan Dunbar , Brian Dillon & William J. Idsardi (2013). A Bayesian evaluation of the cost of abstractness. In Montserrat Sanz , Itziar Laka & Michael K. Tanenhaus (eds.) Language down the garden path: the cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 360384.

Jacques Durand (2005). Tense/lax, the vowel system of English and phonological theory. In Philip Carr , Jacques Durand & Colin J. Ewen (eds.) Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity: phonological papers in honour of John Anderson. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 7797.

Daniel Currie Hall (2011). Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology 28. 154.

S. J. Hannahs (2013). The phonology of Welsh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John Harris (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.

Patrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.) (2015). The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larry M. Hyman (2013). Enlarging the scope of phonologization. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.) Origins of sound change: approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 328.

Martin Krämer (2012). Underlying representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Björn Lindblom (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. JASA 35. 17731781.

Sara Mackenzie (2013). Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Aymara: contrastive representations and constraint interaction. Phonology 30. 297345.

Sara Mackenzie (2016). Consonant harmony in Nilotic: contrastive specifications and Stratal OT. Glossa 1(1):12. 138.

Robert Mayr & Hannah Davies (2011). A cross-dialectal acoustic study of the monophthongs and diphthongs of Welsh. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41. 125.

Bruce Morén (2006). Consonant–vowel interactions in Serbian: features, representations and constraint interactions. Lingua 116. 11981244.

David Odden (2013). Formal Phonology. Nordlyd 40. 249273.

John C. Wells (1979). Final voicing and vowel length in Welsh. Phonetica 36. 344360.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Iosad supplementary material
Iosad supplementary material

 PDF (465 KB)
465 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 134 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th May 2017 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.