Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Reconstructing phonological change: duration and syllable structure in Latin vowel reduction*

  • Ranjan Sen (a1)

During the fixed initial-stress period of Latin (sixth to fifth centuries BC), internal open syllable vowels were totally neutralised, usually raising to /i/ (*ː>perficiō ‘I complete’), whereas in closed syllables /a/ was raised to /e/, but the other vowels remained distinct (*per.fak.tos>perfectus ‘completed’). Miller (1972) explains closed syllable resistance by positing internal secondary stress on closed syllables. However, evidence from vowel reduction and syncope suggest that internal syllables never bore stress in early archaic times. A typologically unusual alternative is proposed: contrary to the pattern normally found (Maddieson 1985), vowels had longer duration in closed syllables than in open syllables, as in Turkish and Finnish, thus permitting speakers to attain the targets for non-high vowels in closed syllables. This durational pattern is manifested not only in vowel reduction, but also in the quantitative changes seen in ‘classical’ and ‘inverse’ compensatory lengthenings, the development CVːCV > CVC and ‘superheavy’ degemination (VːCCV > VːCV).

Hide All

I should like to thank John Coleman, John Penney, Aditi Lahiri and John Harris for their advice in preparing this paper. Three anonymous reviewers and an associate editor also provided many valuable insights and guidance over the course of its evolution. All errors are of course my own.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. Sidney Allen (1978). Vox Latina. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Juliette Blevins (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luigi Burzio (2007). Phonology and phonetics of English stress and vowel reduction. Language Sciences 29. 154176.

Anna Esposito & Maria Gabriella Di Benedetto (1999). Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. JASA 106. 20512062.

Marios Fourakis (1991). Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. JASA 90. 18161827.

Mieko S. Han (1994)Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. JASA 96. 7382.

Bruce Hayes , Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaori Idemaru & Susan G. Guion (2008). Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38. 167186.

Haike Jacobs (2003a). The emergence of quantity-sensitivity in Latin: secondary stress, Iambic Shortening, and theoretical implications for ‘mixed’ stress systems. In D. Eric Holt (ed.) Optimality Theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 229247.

Haike Jacobs (2003b). Why preantepenultimate stress in Latin requires an OT-account. In Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs (eds.) Development in prosodic systems. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 395418.

Haike Jacobs (2004). Rhythmic vowel deletion in OT: syncope in Latin. Probus 16. 6389.

Björn Lindblom (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. JASA 35. 17731781.

Björn Lindblom (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 403439.

John J. McCarthy & Alan Prince (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79153.

Seung-Jae Moon & Björn Lindblom (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. JASA 96. 4055.

Jaye Padgett & Marija Tabain (2005). Adaptive Dispersion Theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica 62. 1454.

Emily R. Pickett , Sheila E. Blumstein & Martha W. Burton (1999). Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica 56. 135157.

Jörgen Pind (1995). Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quantity: the search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Perception and Psychophysics 57. 291304.

Alan Prince & Paul Smolensky (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.

Franck Ramus , Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73. 265292.

Daniel Recasens , Maria Dolors Pallarès & Jordi Fontdevila (1997). A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. JASA 102. 544561.

Ranjan Sen (2012). Exon's Law and the Latin syncopes. In Philomen Probert & Andreas Willi (eds.) Laws and rules in Indo-European. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 205226.

Caroline L. Smith (1995). Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures. In Bruce Connell & Amalia Arvaniti (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205222.

Kenneth N. Stevens & Arthur S. House (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6. 111128.

Jane Stuart-Smith (2004). Phonetics and philology: sound change in Italic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 147 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.