Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Reconstructing phonological change: duration and syllable structure in Latin vowel reduction*

  • Ranjan Sen (a1)
Abstract

During the fixed initial-stress period of Latin (sixth to fifth centuries BC), internal open syllable vowels were totally neutralised, usually raising to /i/ (*per.fa.ki.oː>perficiō ‘I complete’), whereas in closed syllables /a/ was raised to /e/, but the other vowels remained distinct (*per.fak.tos>perfectus ‘completed’). Miller (1972) explains closed syllable resistance by positing internal secondary stress on closed syllables. However, evidence from vowel reduction and syncope suggest that internal syllables never bore stress in early archaic times. A typologically unusual alternative is proposed: contrary to the pattern normally found (Maddieson 1985), vowels had longer duration in closed syllables than in open syllables, as in Turkish and Finnish, thus permitting speakers to attain the targets for non-high vowels in closed syllables. This durational pattern is manifested not only in vowel reduction, but also in the quantitative changes seen in ‘classical’ and ‘inverse’ compensatory lengthenings, the development CVːCV > CVC and ‘superheavy’ degemination (VːCCV > VːCV).

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

I should like to thank John Coleman, John Penney, Aditi Lahiri and John Harris for their advice in preparing this paper. Three anonymous reviewers and an associate editor also provided many valuable insights and guidance over the course of its evolution. All errors are of course my own.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Allen W. Sidney (1973). Accent and rhythm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allen W. Sidney (1978). Vox Latina. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes Jonathan (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bergem Dick van (1995). Acoustic and lexical vowel reduction. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.
Blevins Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burzio Luigi (2007). Phonology and phonetics of English stress and vowel reduction. Language Sciences 29. 154176.
Campbell Nick (1999). A study of Japanese speech timing from the syllable perspective. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 3:2. 2939.
CIL (1862). Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. 17 vols. Berlin: Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften apud G. Reimerum.
Cohn Abigail C., Ham William H. & Podesva Robert J. (1999). The phonetic realization of singleton-geminate contrasts in three languages of Indonesia. InOhala et al. (1999). 587590.
Corssen Wilhelm P. (1858–59). Über Aussprache, Vokalismus und Betonung der lateinischen Sprache. 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
Crosswhite Katherine M. (2001). Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York & London: Routledge.
Crosswhite Katherine M. (2004). Vowel reduction. In Hayes et al. (2004). 191231.
Cser András (1999). Diphthongs in the syllable structure of Latin. Glotta 75. 172193.
de Chene Brent & Anderson Stephen R. (1979). Compensatory lengthening. Lg 55. 505535.
Ernout Alfred, Meillet Antoine & André Jacques (1985). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. 4th edn.Paris: Klincksieck. (1st edn 1932 by Alfred Ernout & Antoine Meillet.)
Esposito Anna & Benedetto Maria Gabriella Di (1999). Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. JASA 106. 20512062.
Fant Gunnar (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production with calculations based on X-ray studies of Russian articulations. The Hague: Mouton.
Flemming Edward S. (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.
Flemming Edward S. (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 232276.
Fourakis Marios (1991). Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. JASA 90. 18161827.
Fromkin Victoria A. (ed.) (1985). Phonetic linguistics: essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. New York: Academic Press.
Gordon Matthew (2004). Syllable weight. In Hayes et al. (2004). 277312.
Gordon Matthew (2006). Syllable weight: phonetics, phonology, typology. New York & London: Routledge.
Hahn Reinhard F. (1991). Spoken Uyghur. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Halle Morris & Idsardi William (1995). General properties of stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith John A. (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 403443.
Ham William H. (2001). Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing. New York & London: Routledge.
Han Mieko S. (1994)Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. JASA 96. 7382.
Hankamer Jorge, Lahiri Aditi & Koreman Jacques (1989). Perception of consonant length: voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali. JPh 17. 283298.
Hansen Benjamin B. (2004). Production of Persian geminate stops: effects of varying speaking rate. In Agwuele Augustine, Warren Willis & Park Sang-Hoon (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Texas linguistics society conference. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 8695.
Hayes Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253306.
Hayes Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayes Bruce, Kirchner Robert & Steriade Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Idemaru Kaori & Guion Susan G. (2008). Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38. 167186.
Jacobs Haike (2003a). The emergence of quantity-sensitivity in Latin: secondary stress, Iambic Shortening, and theoretical implications for ‘mixed’ stress systems. In Holt D. Eric (ed.) Optimality Theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 229247.
Jacobs Haike (2003b). Why preantepenultimate stress in Latin requires an OT-account. In Fikkert Paula & Jacobs Haike (eds.) Development in prosodic systems. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 395418.
Jacobs Haike (2004). Rhythmic vowel deletion in OT: syncope in Latin. Probus 16. 6389.
Jannedy Stefanie (1995). Gestural phasing as an explanation for vowel devoicing in Turkish. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 45. 5684.
Kavitskaya Darya (2002). Compensatory lengthening: phonetics, phonology, diachrony. London & New York: Routledge.
Kawahara Shigeto (2006). A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: the case of [+voice] in Japanese. Lg 82. 536574.
Keane Elinor (2001). Echo words in Tamil. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
Keating Patricia A. (1985). Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. In Fromkin (1985). 115132.
Kingston John & Diehl Randy L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Lg 70. 419454.
Kingston John, Kawahara Shigeto, Chambless Della, Mash Daniel & Brenner-Alsop Eve (2009). Contextual effects on the perception of duration. JPh 37. 297320.
Kluender Keith R., Diehl Randy L. & Wright Beverly A. (1988). Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: an auditory explanation. JPh 16. 153169.
Kopkallı-Yavuz Handan (2003). Interaction between syllable structure and vowel length: example from Turkish /a/. In Sumru Özsoy A., Akar Didar, Nakipoğlu-Demiralp Mine, Erguvanlı-Taylan E. Eser & Aksu-Koç Ayhan (eds.) Studies in Turkish linguistics: proceedings of the 10th International Conference in Turkish Linguistics. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
Kuehn David P. & Moll Kenneth L. (1976). A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. JPh 4. 303320.
Lahiri Aditi & Hankamer Jorge (1988). The timing of geminate consonants. JPh 16. 327338.
Lehiste Ilse (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lehtonen Jaakko (1970). Aspects of quantity in Standard Finnish. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Press.
Leumann Manu (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich: Beck.
Lindau Mona (1985). The story of /r/. In Fromkin (1985). 157168.
Lindblom Björn (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. JASA 35. 17731781.
Lindblom Björn (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle William J. & Marchal Alain (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 403439.
Lindsay W. M. (1894). The Latin language: an historical account of Latin sounds, stems, and flexions. Oxford: Clarendon.
Local John & Simpson Adrian P. (1999). Phonetic implementation of geminates in Malayalam nouns. In Ohala et al. (1999). 595598.
McCarthy John J. & Prince Alan (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79153.
Maddieson Ian (1985). Phonetic cues to syllabification. In Fromkin (1985). 203221.
Meiser Gerhard (1998). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Mester Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. NLLT 12. 161.
Miller Patricia Donegan (1972). Vowel neutralization and vowel reduction. CLS 8. 482489.
Moon Seung-Jae & Lindblom Björn (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. JASA 96. 4055.
Niedermann Max (1997). Précis de phonétique historique du latin. 5th edn.Paris: Klincksieck. (1st edn 1906.)
Ohala John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek C. S., Hendrick R. A. & Miller M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178203.
Ohala John J., Hasegawa Yoko, Ohala Manjari, Granville Daniel & Bailey Ashlee C. (eds.) (1999). Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Berkeley: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
Ohala Manjari (2007). Experimental methods in the study of Hindi geminate consonants. In Solé Maria-Josep, Beddor Patrice Speeter & Ohala Manjari (eds.) Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 351368.
Padgett Jaye & Tabain Marija (2005). Adaptive Dispersion Theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica 62. 1454.
Pickett Emily R., Blumstein Sheila E. & Burton Martha W. (1999). Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica 56. 135157.
Pind Jörgen (1995). Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quantity: the search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Perception and Psychophysics 57. 291304.
Prince Alan & Smolensky Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Ramus Franck, Nespor Marina & Mehler Jacques (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73. 265292.
Recasens Daniel, Pallarès Maria Dolors & Fontdevila Jordi (1997). A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. JASA 102. 544561.
Savithri S. R. (2009). Speech rhythm in Indian languages. Dr N. Rathna Oration, presented at the 41st Indian Speech and Hearing Association Conference, Pune.
Sen Ranjan (2011a). Diachronic phonotactic development in Latin: the work of syllable structure or linear sequence? In Cairns Charles E. & Raimy Eric (eds.) Handbook of the syllable. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 417441.
Sen Ranjan (2011b). Feet and phonological levels in early Latin. Paper presented at the 8th Old World Conference in Phonology, Marrakech.
Sen Ranjan (2012). Exon's Law and the Latin syncopes. In Probert Philomen & Willi Andreas (eds.) Laws and rules in Indo-European. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 205226.
Sen Ranjan (forthcoming). Syllable and segment in Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sihler Andrew L. (1995). New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith Caroline L. (1991). The timing of vowel and consonant gestures in Italian and Japanese. InProceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 4. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence. 234237.
Smith Caroline L. (1995). Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures. In Connell Bruce & Arvaniti Amalia (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205222.
Sommer Ferdinand & Pfister Raimund (1977). Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre: eine Einführung in das sprachwissenschaftliche Studium des Lateins. 4th edn.Heidelberg: Winter. (1st edn 1902 by Ferdinand Sommer.)
Steriade Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Papers in Phonology 3. 25145.
Stevens Kenneth N. & House Arthur S. (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6. 111128.
Stuart-Smith Jane (2004). Phonetics and philology: sound change in Italic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vaan Michiel A. C. de (2008). Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.
Walde Alois & Hofmann J. B. (1938–56). Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3 vols. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Winter. (1st edn 1906.)
Wright Richard (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 3457.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.