Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Templates as the interaction of recursive word structure and prosodic well-formedness*

  • Peter Ara Guekguezian (a1)
Abstract

Templatic morphology involves the appearance of a fixed shape on a morpheme in a specific morphological context. This paper makes two claims: the morphological context of a template is syntactically cyclic, resulting in recursive prosodic word structure, and the shape of a template results from prosodic well-formedness conditions on the internal prosodic word. Templatic morphology in Chukchansi Yokuts illustrates these claims: affixes that trigger templates transfer the root to the phonology before other material is transferred, so that the root forms a prosodic word which is internal to the whole word. Roots with one underlying vowel are augmented to meet a disyllabic minimality requirement on prosodic words; the resulting disyllable forms a light–heavy iamb, to optimally satisfy Chukchansi parsing requirements. Templatic morphology falls out from the predictable interaction of the syntax–phonology interface and general phonological properties of a language, and needs no special apparatus or diacritics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: guekguez@usc.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All

I would first and foremost like to thank my Chukchansi consultant, Holly Wyatt. Her knowledge of her mother tongue is formidable and her dedication to it inspiring. She has put up with years of my pesky linguistic inquiries with good humour, without which none of this paper would exist. My advisor, Karen Jesney, has provided feedback on every aspect of this paper from inception to completion, as well as constant encouragement and focus. Many other linguists gave input on different parts of this work, including Niken Adisasmito-Smith, Brian Agbayani, Chris Golston, Roumyana Pancheva, Rachel Walker and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta. I also acknowledge the valuable input on previous incarnations of parts of this analysis from audiences at the University of Southern California, AMP 2014, NELS 45, the 2016 LSA Annual Meeting and WAIL 19. Any errors in this work are completely my own.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Stephen R. Anderson (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mary E. Beckman (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.

Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Laura Downing (2016). Phasal syntax = cyclic phonology? Syntax 19. 156191.

Laura J. Downing (2006). Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

David Embick (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

D. B. Fry (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27. 765768.

Nancy Hall (2006). Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion. Phonology 23. 387429.

Brett Hyde (2007). Non-finality and weight-sensitivity. Phonology 24. 287334.

Junko Ito & Armin Mester (2013). Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124. 2040.

Michael Kenstowicz & Charles Kisseberth (1979). Generative phonology: description and theory. New York: Academic Press.

Paul Kiparsky (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17. 351365.

Angelika Kratzer (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109137.

Angelika Kratzer & Elisabeth Selkirk (2007). Phase theory and prosodic spell-out: the case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24. 93135.

John J. McCarthy (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75138.

Heather Newell & Glyne Piggott (2014). Interactions at the syntax–phonology interface: evidence from Ojibwe. Lingua 150. 332362.

Elisabeth Selkirk (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In John Goldsmith , Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 435484.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 460 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th May 2017 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.