Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A theory of subfeatural representations: the case of rounding harmony in Laal*

  • Florian Lionnet (a1)
Abstract

This paper introduces subfeatural representations to capture subphonemic distinctions at work in ‘subphonemic teamwork’. The unusual case of Laal is presented, in which rounding harmony requires two triggers: a round vowel and a labial consonant. The coarticulatory effect of the labial consonant is shown, on the basis of instrumental evidence, to incur a distinctive, but non-contrastive, intermediate level of rounding on the target vowel, analysed as being featurally [−round], but subfeaturally 〚xround〛 (0 < x < 1). 〚xround〛 vowels are shown to form a separate natural class, which can be independently targeted by phonological processes. Subfeatural representations are argued to constitute an advantageous reification of phonetic knowledge, forming a more solid basis for phonetically driven models of phonology. This proposal builds on the insights of previous literature that perceptual representations are needed in phonology, while eschewing the need for direct reference to phonetics.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A theory of subfeatural representations: the case of rounding harmony in Laal*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A theory of subfeatural representations: the case of rounding harmony in Laal*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A theory of subfeatural representations: the case of rounding harmony in Laal*
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: flionnet@princeton.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All
*

For their very helpful comments and the many hours they spent reading this paper, I would like to thank Sharon Inkelas, Larry Hyman and William Bennett, and two anonymous reviewers. Many thanks are also due to Natalie DelBusso, Keith Johnson, Douglas Pulleyblank, Stephanie Shih and Donca Steriade, as well as audiences at UC Berkeley, Stanford University, AMP 2013 (UMass), OCP 11 (Leiden, 2014), the 88th and 90th Meetings of the LSA, the ABC-Conference (UC Berkeley, 2014), WCCFL 33, MFM 23 and NELS 46. My research on Laal is funded through a Volkswagen Foundation DoBeS grant. Any error is my own.

The appendices mentioned in the paper are available as online supplementary materials at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675717000276.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Archangeli Diana & Pulleyblank Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bakovi« Eric (2000). Harmony, dominance and control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Beckman Jill N. (1999). Positional faithfulness: an Optimality Theoretic treatment of phonological asymmetries. New York: Garland.
Bennett William G. (2013). Dissimilation, consonant harmony, and surface correspondence. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Bennett William G. (2015). The phonology of consonants: harmony, dissimilation, and correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaho Sylvia (2008). The syntax of phonology: a radically substance-free approach. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Boersma Paul (1998). Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma Paul & Weenink David (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.4). http://www.praat.org.
Boyeldieu Pascal (1977). Eléments pour une phonologie du laal de Gori (Moyen-Chari). In Caprile Jean-Pierre (ed.) Études phonologiques tchadiennes. Paris: SELAF. 187198.
Boyeldieu Pascal (1982). Deux études laal (Moyen-Chari, Tchad) . Berlin: Reimer.
Boyeldieu Pascal (1987). Déterminations directe/indirecte en laal. In Boyeldieu Pascal (ed.) La maison du chef et la tête du cabri: des degrés de la détermination nominale dans les langues d'Afrique centrale. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner. 7787.
Clements G. N. (1989). On the representation of vowel height. Ms, Cornell University.
Clements G. N. (1991). Vowel height assimilation in Bantu languages. BLS 17:2. 2564.
Clements G. N. & Hume Elizabeth V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith John A. (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 245306.
Dinnsen Daniel & Garcia-Zamor M. (1971). The three degrees of vowel length in German. Papers in Linguistics 4. 111126.
Donegan Patricia J. & Stampe David (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126173.
Flemming Edward (1997). Phonetic detail in phonology: evidence from assimilation and coarticulation. In Suzuki & Elzinga (1997). 39–50.
Flemming Edward (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18. 744.
Flemming Edward (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. London & New York: Routledge.
Flemming Edward (2008). The realized input. Ms, MIT. Available (August 2017) at http://web.mit.edu/flemming/www/paper/RI2.pdf.
Gallagher Gillian (2007). Pharyngeal preservation in West Greenlandic. Handout of paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Anaheim.
Gnanadesikan Amalia (1997). Phonology with ternary scales. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hall Kathleen Currie (2013). A typology of intermediate phonological relationships. The Linguistic Review 30. 215275.
Hansson Gunnar Ólafur (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hansson Gunnar Ólafur (2010). Consonant harmony: long-distance interaction in phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hansson Gunnar Ólafur (2014). (Dis)agreement by (non)correspondence: inspecting the foundations. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report: ABC Conference Archive. Slides available (August 2017) at http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/documents/2014/ABCC/Hansson.pdf.
Hansson Gunnar Ólafur & Moore Patrick J. (2011). The phonetics of transparency in Kaska vowel harmony. In Tuttle Siri & Lovick Olga (eds.) Working Papers in Athabaskan Languages 2010. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.
Hayes Bruce, Kirchner Robert & Steriade Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes Bruce & Steriade Donca (2004). Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 1–33.
Inkelas Sharon & Shih Stephanie S. (2014). Unstable surface correspondence as the source of local conspiracies. NELS 44:1. 191204.
Johnson C. Douglas (1972). Formal aspects of phonological description. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Jun Jongho (2002). Positional faithfulness, sympathy, and inferred input. Ms, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. Available (August 2017) at http://ling.snu.ac.kr/jun/work/inferred.pdf.
Jurgec Peter (2011). Feature spreading 2.0: a unified theory of assimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Jurgec Peter (2013). Two types of parasitic assimilation. Nordlyd 40. 108135.
Kaun Abigail R. (1995). The typology of rounding harmony: an optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Kaun Abigail R. (2004). The typology of rounding harmony. In Hayes et al. (2004). 87–116.
Kavitskaya Darya (2014). Segmental inventory and the evolution of harmony in Crimean Tatar. Turkic Languages 17. 86114.
Kingston John & Diehl Randy L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Lg 70. 419454.
Kiparsky Paul (2013). Phonemic analyses are not data: on the empirical basis of phonological typology. Paper presented at the Phonological Typology conference, Oxford.
Kirchner Robert (1993). Turkish vowel harmony and disharmony: an Optimality Theoretic account. Ms, UCLA. Available as ROA-4 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Labov William, Karen Mark & Miller Corey (1991). Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3. 3374.
Ladefoged Peter (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Legendre Géraldine, Miyata Yoshiro & Smolensky Paul (1990). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: an application. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 884–891.
Lindau Mona (1978). Vowel features. Lg 54. 541563.
Linker Wendy (1982). Articulatory and acoustic correlates of labial activity in vowels: a cross-linguistic study. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lionnet Florian (2015). Phonological teamwork as quantal markedness. WCCFL 33. 7685.
Lionnet Florian (2016). Subphonemic teamwork: a typology and theory of cumulative coarticulatory effects in phonology. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Macken Marlys A. & Barton David (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7. 4174.
Maxwell Edith M. & Weismer Gary (1982). The contribution of phonological, acoustic, and perceptual techniques to the characterization of a misarticulating child's voice contrast for stops. Applied Psycholinguistics 3. 2943.
Mielke Jeff (2008). The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore Brian C. J. & Glasberg Brian R. (1983). Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. JASA 74. 750753.
Ní Chiosáin Máire & Padgett Jaye (1993). Inherent VPlace. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Padgett Jaye (1997). Partial class behavior and nasal place assimilation. In Suzuki & Elzinga (1997). 145–183.
Pasquereau Jérémy C. (2014). Phonological degrees of labiality: evidence from Karata. Poster presented at the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of Southern California. Available (August 2017) at https://jeremy-pasquereau.jimdo.com.
Pierrehumbert Janet (2000). The phonetic grounding of phonology. Les Cahiers de l'ICP: Bulletin de la Communication Parlée 5. 723.
Port Robert, Mitleb Fares & O'Dell Michael (1981). Neutralization of obstruent voicing is incomplete. JASA 70. S13.
Prince Alan & Smolensky Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Pulleyblank Douglas (2002). Harmony drivers: no disagreement allowed. BLS 28. 249267.
Rhodes Russell (2012). Vowel harmony as Agreement by Correspondence. Annual Report of the UC Berkeley Phonology Laboratory. 138–168.
Rose Sharon & Walker Rachel (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Lg 80. 475531.
Sasa Tomomasa (2009). Treatment of vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. PhD thesis, University of Iowa.
Scobbie James M. & Stuart-Smith Jane (2008). Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: examples from Scottish English. In Avery Peter, Dresher B. Elan & Rice Keren (eds.) Contrast in phonology: theory, perception, acquisition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 87113.
Shih Stephanie S. (2013). Consonant–tone interaction as Agreement by Correspondence. Ms, Stanford University & University of California, Berkeley. Available (August 2017) at http://cogsci.ucmerced.edu/shih/shih-ctoneABC-draftms_1-18-13.pdf.
Shih Stephanie S. & Inkelas Sharon (2014). A subsegmental correspondence approach to contour tone (dis)harmony patterns. In Kingston John, Moore-Cantwell Claire, Pater Joe & Staubs Robert (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Meeting on Phonology. Available (August 2017) at http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/amphonology/article/view/22.
Slowiaczek Louisa M. & Dinnsen Daniel A. (1985). On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. JPh 13. 325341.
Smolensky Paul (1993). Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop. Available as ROA-87 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Smolensky Paul (1995). On the internal structure of the constraint component Con of UG. Ms, Johns Hopkins University. Available as ROA-86 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Smolensky Paul & Legendre Géraldine (eds.) (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sohn Ho-Min (1971). A-raising in Woleaian. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 3:8. 1535.
Sohn Ho-Min (1975). Woleaian reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Stampe David (1973). A dissertation on Natural Phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago. Published 1979, New York: Garland.
Steriade Donca (1997). Lexical conservatism and its analysis. Ms, UCLA.
Steriade Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 3. 25145.
Steriade Donca (2000). Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics–phonology boundary. In Broe Michael B. & Pierrehumbert Janet B. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313334.
Steriade Donca (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account. In Hume Elizabeth & Johnson Keith (eds.) The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. 219250.
Steriade Donca (2009). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson Kristin & Inkelas Sharon (eds.) The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 151179.
Suzuki Keiichiro (1997). Double-sided effect in OT: sequential grounding and local conjunction. In Suzuki & Elzinga (1997). 209–224.
Suzuki Keiichiro & Elzinga Dirk (eds.) (1997). Proceedings of the 1995 Southwestern Workshop on Optimality Theory (SWOT) . Tucson: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.
Sylak-Glassman John (2014). Deriving natural classes: the phonology and typology of post-velar consonants. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Terbeek Dale (1977). A cross-language multidimensional scaling study of vowel perception. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Walker Rachel (1998). Nasalization, neutral segments and opacity effects. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Walker Rachel (2000). Nasal reduplication in Mbe affixation. Phonology 17. 65115.
Walker Rachel (2001). Consonantal correspondence. In Kirchner Robert, Pater Joe & Wikeley Wolf (eds.) Papers in theoretical linguistics 6: workshop on the lexicon in phonetics and phonology. Edmonton: University of Alberta. 7384.
Walker Rachel (2009). Similarity-sensitive blocking and transparency in Menominee. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.
Wayment Adam (2009). Assimilation as attraction: computing distance, similarity, and locality in phonology. PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Lionnet supplementary material
Appendices A-D

 PDF (527 KB)
527 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 204 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th December 2017 - 19th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.