Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A theory-driven model of handshape similarity*

  • Jonathan Keane (a1), Zed Sevcikova Sehyr (a2), Karen Emmorey (a2) and Diane Brentari (a1)
Abstract

Following the Articulatory Model of Handshape (Keane 2014), which mathematically defines handshapes on the basis of joint angles, we propose two methods for calculating phonetic similarity: a contour difference method, which assesses the amount of change between handshapes within a fingerspelled word, and a positional similarity method, which compares similarity between pairs of letters in the same position across two fingerspelled words. Both methods are validated with psycholinguistic evidence based on similarity ratings by deaf signers. The results indicate that the positional similarity method more reliably predicts native signer intuition judgements about handshape similarity. This new similarity metric fills a gap in the literature (the lack of a theory-driven similarity metric) that has been empty since effectively the beginning of sign-language linguistics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: jonkeane@uchicago.edu, zsevcikova@mail.sdsu.edu, kemmorey@mail.sdsu.edu, dbrentari@uchicago.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All
*

This work would not have been possible without the contributions of the Deaf signers who participated in our experiments. The manuscript greatly benefited from the feedback of our colleagues Jordan Fenlon, Leah Geer and Jason Riggle, as well as the anonymous reviewers. All mistakes and omissions are our own. This work was also supported in part by a Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (NSF BCS 1251807) and a NSF Research Grant (IIS 1409886).

Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 299 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th August 2017 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.