Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Units in the analysis of signs*

  • Harry van der Hulst (a1)
Extract

The assumption that there is a common set of linguistic principles underlying both spoken language and sign language phonology, which forms part of the human language capacity, is shared by most phonologists working on sign language. See Sandler (1993a) for an extensive discussion of these issues. But even though this assumption is reasonable, since both spoken and signed languages are products of the same human brain and fulfil the same function, it is not clear that theories of representation which have been proposed for spoken languages can be directly applied to the structure of sign languages. Such representations have been developed on the basis of the spoken language modality only. They are often so close to the phonetics of spoken languages that we cannot rule out the possibility that non-trivial aspects of them are modality-specific. Therefore, rather than, for example, attempting to test various competing (spoken language-based) theories of syllable structure, we must first investigate the structure of sign language in its own right. This strategy need not be pushed too far, however. In developing a model of signs we can benefit from general principles which have proved successful in the study of spoken languages, especially if these principles do not seem to be directly based on ‘spoken phonetics’.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ahn, S.-H. (1990). A structured-tiers model for ASL phonology. In Lucas (1990). 1126.
Anderson, J. (1987). The limits of linearity. In Anderson, J. & Durand, J. (eds.) Explorations in dependency phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. 199220.
Anderson, J. & Ewen, C. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Battison, R. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Brennan, M. (1990). Word formation in British Sign Language. Ms, University of Stockholm.
Brentari, D. (1990). Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Brentari, D. & Goldsmith, J. (1993). Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In Coulter (1993). 1941.
Chinchor, N. (1978). The syllable in ASL. Paper presented at the MIT Sign Language Symposium, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225252.
Corina, D. P. (1990a). Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representations. In Lucas (1990). 2749.
Corina, D. P. (1990b). Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: evidence from a visual-gestural language. CLS 26:2. 3144.
Corina, D. P. (1993). To branch or not to branch: underspecification in ASL handshape contours. In Coulter (1993). 6395.
Coulter, G. R. (1982). On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego.
Coulter, G. R. (ed.) (1993). Current issues in ASL phonology. New York: Academic Press.
Dresher, E. & Hulst, H. van der (1992). Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology. Ms, University of Toronto & University of Leiden.
Edmondson, W. H. (1985). Autosegmental phonology: the syllable and the sign. In Tervoort, B. (ed.) Signs of life. Amsterdam: Institute of General Linguistics, University of Amsterdam. 7994.
Edmondson, W. H. (1990). Segments in signed languages: do they exist and does it matter? In Edmondson, W. H. & Karlsson, F. (eds.) SLR '87: Papers from the 4th International Symposium on Sign Language Research. Hamburg: Signum. 6674.
Ewen, C. (to appear). Dependency relations in phonology. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.) A handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fischer, S. & Siple, P. (eds.) (1990). Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Greftegreff, I. (1992). Orientation in indexical signs in Norwegian Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15. 159182.
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hamnosys, (1989). Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T., Henning, J. et al. Hamburg notation system for sign languages: an introductory guide. Version 2.0. Hamburg: Signum.
Hayes, B. (1990). Diphthongisation and coindexing. Phonology 7. 3171.
Hayes, B. (1991). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Ms, UCLA.
Hayes, B. (1993). Against movement. In Coulter (1993). 213226.
Hirst, D. (1985). Linearization and the single segment hypothesis. In Guéron, J., Obenauer, H.-G. & Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.) Grammatical representation. Dordrecht: Foris. 87100.
Hulst, H. G. Van Der (1989). Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependency. Phonology 6. 253284.
Hulst, H. G. van der (1993). Radical CV phonology. Ms, University of Leiden.
Kager, R. (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, R. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1990). Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 193231.
Kegl, J. & Wilbur, R. (1976). Where does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology and phonology vs. stylistic variations in American Sign Language. CLS 12. 376396.
Komva, (1988). Notatie-systeem voor Nederlandse gebaren. Amsterdam: Nederlandse Stichting voor het Dove en Slechthorende Kind.
Liddell, S. K. (1982). Sequentiality in American Sign Language signs. Paper presented at the Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, College Park, Maryland.
Liddell, S. K. (1984). THINK and BELIEVE: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Lg 60. 372399.
Liddell, S. K. (1990). Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In Fischer & Siple (1990). 3765.
Liddell, S. K. & Johnson, R. E. (1986). American Sign Language - compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. NLLT 4. 445513.
Liddell, S. K. & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64. 195278.
Lombardi, L. (1990). The nonlinear organization of the affricate. NLLT 8. 375425.
Lucas, C. (ed.) (1990). Sign language research: theoretical issues. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43. 84108.
Mandel, M. (1981). Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Nagahara, H. (1988). Towards an explicit phonological representation for American Sign Language. MA thesis, UCLA.
Padden, C. A. & Perlmutter, D. M. (1987). American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. NLLT 5. 335375.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1991). Feature geometry in a language with two active articulators. Paper presented at the Conference on Segmental Structure, Santa Cruz.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. LI 23. 407442.
Sagey, E. C. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sandler, W. (1986). The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies SO. 128.
Sandler, W. (1987). Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sandler, W. (1991). The internal organization of hand configuration in ASL. Paper presented at the Conference on Segmental Structure, Santa Cruz.
Sandler, W. (1993a). Sign language and modularity. Lingua 89. 315351.
Sandler, W. (1993b). Linearization of phonological tiers in ASL. In Coulter (1993). 103129.
Sandler, W. (to appear a). Hand in hand: the role of the nondominant hand in American Sign Language. The Linguistic Review 9.
Sandler, W. (to appear b). Markedness in ASL handshapes: a componential analysis. In Hulst, H. G. van der & van de Weijer, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the HIL Phonology Conference. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Stack, K. (1988). Tiers and syllable structure in American Sign Language: evidence from phonotactics. MA thesis, UCLA.
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure. 2nd edn 1978. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs and motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Weijer, J. van de (1992). Lexical patterns in Turkish. Ms, University of Leiden.
Weijer, J. van de (in preparation). Segmental structure and complex segments. Ms, University of Leiden.
Wilbur, R. (1987). American Sign Language: linguistic and applied dimensions. 2nd edn. Boston: College Hill Press.
Wilbur, R. (1990). Why syllables? What the notion means for ASL research. In Fischer, S. & Siple, P. (eds.) Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 81108.
Wilbur, R. (1993). Syllables and segments: hold the movement and move the holds! In Coulter (1993). 135168.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed