Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:25:48.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vowel raising in Basaa: a synchronic chain shift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Deborah Schlindwein Schmidt
Deborah Schlindwein Schmidt
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like many of the zone A Bantu languages of western equatorial Africa, Basaa, which is spoken over a large area to the north-east and east of Douala, Cameroon, shows an inventory of seven surface vowels (Guthrie 1953). The Basaa forms cited in this article, all of which are found in the comprehensive Dictionnaire Basaa-Français (Lemb & de Gastines 1973), are transcribed using the vowel symbols in (1):

These vowel symbols differ from those used by Guthrie only in that the hooks are eliminated from underneath his [i] and [u] and the dots are eliminated from underneath his [???] and [???]. I assume for these vowels the characteristics indicated in (1), where non-parenthesised feature specifications are a property of surface phonological representation and parenthesised feature specifications are default phonetic values. Following Hyman's (1988) analysis of Esimbi, another Cameroonian language containing these vowels in its inventory, I take [E] and [ɔ] to be low.

The verb roots in (2) contain instances of each of the seven surface vowels of Basaa:

Though bare verb roots may surface unsuffixed, suffixal extensions may also be added to give applied, passive, habitual, direct causative, indirect causative, simultaneous, associative, possessive, reversive, reflexive, stative and nominalised forms. Of interest to us is the vowel raising induced within the verb root when certain of these suffixal extensions are added. In (3) we see the CVC verb forms of (2) along with their corresponding applied and indirect causative forms:

Other suffixal extensions that induce raising are the passive, direct causative, simultaneous, reversive and stative extensions. For example, these other suffixal extensions attach to /ten/, one of the verb roots in (3), to give [tina], [tinis], [tinha], [tinil] and [tiní], respectively.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , August 1996 , pp. 239 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, D. (1984). Under specification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1988, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Calabrese, A. (1988). Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Guthrie, M. (1953). The Bantu languages of western equatorial Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. (1973). The vowel harmony system of the Okpe monosyllabic verb. Research Notes from the Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ibadan 6. 79–111.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1988). Underspecification and vowel height transfer in Esimbi. Phonology 5. 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, J. (1984). Melodic dissimilation in Ainu. LI 15. 505–513.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lemb, P. & de Gastines, F. (1973). Dictionnaire Basaa-Français. Douala: College Libermann.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1995). Remarks on phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. To appear in Lecarme, Jacqueline, Lowenstamm, Jean & Shlonsky, Ur (eds.) Studies in Afroasiatic grammar. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1993). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Myers, S. (1991). Persistent rules. LI 22. 315–344.Google Scholar
Omamor, A. (1973). Uvwie: a case of vowels merging. Research Notes from the Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ibadan 6. 113–143.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (1988). On constraints and repair strategies. The Linguistic Review 6. 71–97.Google Scholar
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1984). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1. 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlindwein, D. (1989). Context sensitive fill-in rules and Underspecification theory. Linguistic Analysis 19. 77–98.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. (1994). Phantom consonants in Basaa. Phonology 11. 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, D. (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 114–174.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. & van Leynseele, H. (1979). Underlying cross-height vowel harmony in Nen (Bantu A.44). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 1. 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. A. A. (1962). The vowel systems of Dagaari and Lobiri. Ms, University of Ghana.Google Scholar