Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T06:43:44.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dorigen’s Boundless Subjectivity in Chaucer’s The Franklin’s Tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2025

Abstract

This essay argues that in Chaucer’s The Franklin’s Tale, Dorigen develops a selfhood that remains unflinchingly available to others. While the tale’s men pursue a closed selfhood subtended by chivalric expectations for heroic masculinity, Dorigen’s porous selfhood represents a different, vulnerable ideal. Dorigen’s selfhood is open and trusting, and it meets the material world in all its ugliness and danger. Throughout her promise and her complaint, Dorigen maintains a subjectivity that is open to all and bound to none; her difficulties, we argue, arise not from naivete but from the ways in which the buffered, chivalric world disallows and even destroys other formations of selfhood. Although Dorigen recedes by the tale’s conclusion, her boundless, permeable subjectivity is held up as The Franklin’s Tale’s ideal, and the threats to it are clearly exposed as broader harms by the tale’s end.

Information

Type
Essay
Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We would like to thank our constant interlocutors: Lisa H. Cooper, Rebecca Davis, Andrea Denny-Brown, and Shannon Gayk.

References

Works Cited

Aers, David. “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; or, Reflections on Literary Critics Writing the ‘History of the Subject.’” Culture and History, 1350–1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing, edited by Aers, Wayne State UP, 1992, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar
Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. Idols in the East: European Representations of Islam and the Orient, 1100–1450. Cornell UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Iswolsky, Hélène, Indiana UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Robyn A.Learning to Live in Communities: Household Confession and Medieval Forms of Living.” New Medieval Literatures, vol. 22, 2022, pp. 162213.Google Scholar
Batkie, Stephanie L., et al., editors. A New Companion to Critical Thinking on Chaucer. Arc Humanities, 2021.Google Scholar
Bennett, Alastair. “‘The Emprentyng of Hire Consolacioun’: Engraving, Erosion, and Persistent Speech in The Franklin’s Tale .” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 41, 2019, pp. 141–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Mary R.‘Half as She Were Mad’: Dorigen in the Male World of the Franklin’s Tale.The Chaucer Review, vol. 27, no. 3, 1993, pp. 239–51.Google Scholar
Bryan, Jennifer. Looking Inward: Devotional Reading and the Private Self in Late Medieval England. U of Pennsylvania P, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Glenn D. “Becoming One Flesh, Inhabiting Two Genders: Ugly Feelings and Blocked Emotion in the Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale.” Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Burger and Holly A. Crocker, Cambridge UP, 2019, pp. 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Glenn D.. “‘Pite Renneth Soone in Gentil Herte’: Ugly Feelings and Gendered Conduct in Chaucer’s Legend of Good Women .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 52, no. 1, 2017, pp. 6684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Glenn D.. “Who Could Tell the Joy That Is between a Husband and His Wife? Feeling with the Good Wife in the Franklin’s Tale .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 55, no. 4, 2020, pp. 422–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Michael. “Chaucer’s Dorigen and Boccaccio’s Female Voices.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 29, 2007, pp. 259–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. “The Gentilesse of Chaucer’s Franklin.” Criticism, vol. 23, no. 4, 1981, pp. 283300.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry, D. Benson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. U of Minnesota P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Susan. “The Franklin as Dorigen.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 24, no. 3, 1990, pp. 236–52.Google Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.Feminism without Gender: Piers Plowman, ‘Mede the Mayde,’ and Late Medieval Literary Studies.” Exemplaria, vol. 31, no. 2, 2019, pp. 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.. The Matter of Virtue: Women’s Ethical Action from Chaucer to Shakespeare. U of Pennsylvania P, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.. “The Problem of the Premodern.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, pp. 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.. “Vertu.” Batkie et al., pp. 171–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.. “W(h)ither Feminism? Gender, Subjectivity, and the Knight’s Tale .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 54, no. 3, 2019, pp. 352–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Rebecca. “‘Of Spicerye of Leef, and Bark, and Roote’: Recombinative Materiality in the Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale.” Exemplaria, vol. 35, no. 2, 2023, pp. 109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn, and Lochrie, Karma. “Queering History.” PMLA, vol. 121, no. 3, May 2006, pp. 837–38.Google Scholar
Edmondson, George. “Pulling Back from Politics: Second Nature and Oikonomia in the Franklin’s Tale .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 56, no. 3, 2021, pp. 225–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. R. Chaucer and Boccaccio: Antiquity and Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganim, John. “Identity and Subjecthood.” Chaucer: An Oxford Guide, edited by Steve Ellis, Oxford UP, 2005, pp. 224–38.Google Scholar
Ganze, Alison. “‘My Trouthe for to Holde—Allas, Allas!’: Dorigen and Honor in the Franklin’s Tale .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 42, no. 3, 2008, pp. 312–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Richard F. A Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England. U of Pennsylvania P, 1999.Google Scholar
Hanning, Robert W. The Individual in Twelfth-Century Romance. Yale UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. U of California P, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Carissa. “On Servant Women, Rape Culture, and Endurance.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 57, no. 4, 2022, pp. 475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Honour, N.” Middle English Dictionary, U of Michigan, 2024, quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary/MED21149.Google Scholar
Houlik-Ritchey, Emily. “Dwelling with Humans and Nonhumans: Neighboring Ethics in The Franklin’s Tale .” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 41, 2019, pp. 107–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eleanor. “Objects of the Law: The Cases of Dorigen and Virginia.” Medieval Women and Their Objects, edited by Jenny Adams and Nancy Mason Bradbury, U of Michigan P, 2017, pp. 201–28.Google Scholar
Kao, Wan-Chuan. “The Body in Wonder: Affective Suspension and Medieval Queer Futurity.” Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice: A Feel for the Text, edited by Stephen Ahern, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
Kao, Wan-Chuan.. “Conduct Shameful and Unshameful in The Franklin’s Tale .” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 34, 2012, pp. 99139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–60. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, translated by Dennis Porter, W. W. Norton, 1997. Book 7 of The Seminar of Jacques Lacan.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall, Jr. The Disenchanted Self: Representing the Subject in the Canterbury Tales. U of California P, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Emma. Affections of the Mind: The Politics of Sacramental Marriage in Late Medieval English Literature. U of Notre Dame P, 2007.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill. Feminizing Chaucer. D. S. Brewer, 1991.Google Scholar
Manne, Kate. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford UP, 2018.Google Scholar
McEntire, Sandra J.Illusions and Interpretation in the Franklin’s Tale .” The Chaucer Review, vol. 31, no. 2, 1996, pp. 145–63.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J. Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge UP, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Anne. “Chaucer’s ‘New Men’ and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales.” Literature and Society: Selected Papers from the English Institute, edited by Edward Said, Johns Hopkins UP, 1980, pp. 15–56.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gerald. “A Defense of Dorigen’s Complaint.” Medium Ævum, vol. 46, no. 1, 1977, pp. 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barbara. The Permeable Self: Five Medieval Relationships. U of Pennsylvania P, 2021.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. U of Wisconsin P, 1991.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee. “On the Margin: Postmodernism, Ironic History, and Medieval Studies.” Speculum, vol. 65, no. 1, 1990, pp. 87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, John. “‘Work and Werk’ in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale .” Literature and Psychology, vol. 49, 2003, pp. 77109.Google Scholar
Pugh, Tison. “Mutual Masochism and the Hermaphroditic Courtly Lady in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale .” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 33, 2011, pp. 149–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raybin, David. “‘Wommen, of Kynde, Desiren Libertee’: Rereading Dorigen, Rereading Marriage.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 27, no. 1, 1992, pp. 6586.Google Scholar
Riddy, Felicity. “Engendering Pity in the Franklin’s Tale.” Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature, edited by Ruth Evans and Leslie Johnson, Routledge, 1994, pp. 54–71.Google Scholar
Robertson, Elizabeth. “Marriage, Mutual Consent, and the Affirmation of the Female Subject in the Knight’s Tale, the Wife of Bath’s Tale, and the Franklin’s Tale.” Drama, Narrative and Poetry in the Canterbury Tales, edited by Wendy Harding, PU du Mirail, 2003, pp. 175–93.Google Scholar
Rudd, Gillian. “Human Responses to the Environment in Medieval Literature.” A Global History of Literature and the Environment, edited by John Parham and Louise Westling, Cambridge UP, 2017, pp. 141–55.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Ohio State UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth. “The Women in Chaucer’s ‘Marriage Group.’Medieval Feminist Forum, vol. 45, no. 1, 2009, pp. 5056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth. “‘Ysworn…without Gilt’: Lais of Illusion-Making Language in the Canterbury Tales .” Etudes Epistémè, vol. 25, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4000/episteme.230.Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian. Last Words: The Public Self and the Social Author in Late Medieval England. Oxford UP, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Belknap Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. “Viscous Porosity: Witnessing Katrina.” Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, Indiana UP, 2008, pp. 188–213.Google Scholar
“Voiden, V.” Middle English Dictionary, U of Michigan, 2024, quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary/MED51354.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Cord. “Blak.” Batkie et al., pp. 217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Tara. “Merveille.” Batkie et al., pp. 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Women and Causality. Verso, 1994.Google Scholar