Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data

  • Keith T. Poole (a1)

Abstract

This paper shows a general nonparametric unfolding technique for maximizing the correct classification of binary choice or two-category data. The motivation for and the primary focus of the unfolding technique are parliamentary roll call voting data. However, the procedures that implement the unfolding also can be applied to the problem of unfolding rank order data as well as analyzing a data set that would normally be the subject of a probit, logit, or linear probability analysis. One aspect of the scaling method greatly improves Manski's “maximum score estimator” technique for estimating limited dependent variable models. To unfold binary choice data two subproblems must be solved. First, given a set of chooser or legislator points, a cutting plane must be found such that it divides the legislators/choosers into two sets that reproduce the actual choices as closely as possible. Second, given a set of cutting planes for the binary choices, a point for each chooser or legislator must be found which reproduces the actual choices as closely as possible. Solutions for these two problems are shown in this paper. Monte Carlo tests of the procedure show it to be highly accurate in the presence of voting error and missing data.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Andrich, David. 1995. “Hyperbolic Cosine Latent Trait Models for Unfolding Direct Responses and Pairwise Preferences.” Applied Psychological Measurement 19: 269290.
Bennett, Joseph F., and Hays, William L. 1960. “Multidimensional Unfolding: Determining the Dimensionality of Ranked Preference Data.” Psychometrika 25: 2743.
Best, Alvin M., Young, Forrest W., and Hall, Robert G. 1979. “On the Precision of a Euclidean Structure.” Psychometrika 44: 395408.
van Blokland-Vogelesang, Rian. 1991. Unfolding and Group Consensus Ranking for Individual Preferences. Leiden: DWSO Press.
Borg, Ingwer, and Groenen, Patrick. 1997. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Carroll, J. Douglas. 1980. “Models and Methods for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferential Choice (or Other Dominance) Data.” In Similarity and Choice, eds. Lantermann, E. D. and Feger, H. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
Chang, J. J., and Douglas Carroll, J. 1969. How to Use MDPREF, a Computer Program for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Data, Computer manual. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Labs.
Coombs, Clyde. 1950. “Psychological Scaling Without a Unit of Measurement.” Psychological Review 57: 148158.
Coombs, Clyde. 1964. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DeSarbo, Wayne S., and Cho, Jaewun. 1989. “A Stochastic Multidimensional Scaling Vector Threshold Model for the Spatial Representation of ‘Pick Any/N’ Data.” Psychometrika 54: 105129.
DeSarbo, Wayne S., and Hoffman, Donna L. 1987. “Constructing MDS Joint Spaces from Binary Choice Data: A Multidimensional Unfolding Threshold Model for Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 24: 4054.
Eckart, Carl, and Young, Gale. 1936. “The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank.” Psychometrika 1: 211218.
Gifi, Albert. 1990. Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chicester, England: Wiley.
Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Heckman, James J., and Snyder, James M. 1997. “Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes With an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators.” Rand Journal of Economics 28: 142189.
Heiser, Willem J. 1981. Unfolding Analysis of Proximity Data. Leiden: University of Leiden.
Hojo, Hiroshi. 1994. “A New Method for Multidimensional Unfolding.” Behaviormetrika 21: 131147.
King, David C. 1998. “Party Competition and Polarization in American Politics.” Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Kruskal, Joseph B., Young, Forrest W., and Seery, Judith B. 1978. “How to Use KYST-2, a Very Flexible Program to Do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding.” Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Laboratories (unpublished).
Lang, Serge. 1979. Calculus of Several Variables. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Lingoes, James C. 1963. “Multiple Scalogram Analysis: A Set-Theoretic Model for Analyzing Dichotomous Items.” Education and Psychological Measurement 23: 501524.
Londregan, John B. 2000. “Estimating Legislators’ Preferred Points. Political Analysis 8(1): 3556.
MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1958. Dimensions of Congressional Voting. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Manski, Charles F. 1975. “Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice.” Journal of Econometrics 3: 205228.
Manski, Charles F. 1985. “Semiparametric Analysis of Discrete Response: Asymptotic Properties of the Maximum Score Estimator.” Journal of Econometrics 27: 313333.
Manski, Charles F., and Scott Thompson, T. 1986. “Operational Characteristics of Maximum Score Estimation.” Journal of Econometrics 32: 85108.
McFadden, Daniel. 1976. “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5: 363390.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ross, John, and Cliff, Norman. 1964. “A Generalization of the Interpoint Distance Model.” Psychometrika 29: 167176.
Salas, Saturnino L., and Hille, Einar. 1974. Calculus: One and Several Variables with Analytic Geometry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schonemann, Peter H. 1966. “A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem.” Psychometrika 31: 110.
Shye, Samuel, 1978. Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spector, L., and Mazzeo, M. 1980. “Probit Analysis and Economic Education.” Journal of Economic Education 11: 3744.
Tucker, L. R. 1960. “Intra-individual and Inter-individual Multidimensionality.” In Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications, eds. Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. New York: Wiley.
Van Schuur, Wijbrandt H. 1992. “Nonparametric Unidimensional Unfolding for Multicategory Data.” In Political Analysis, Vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John H. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Weisberg, Herbert F. 1968. Dimensional Analysis of Legislative Roll Calls, Doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Young, Gale, and Householder, A. S. 1938. “Discussion of a Set of Points in Terms of their Mutual Distances.” Psychometrika 3: 1922.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data

  • Keith T. Poole (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.