Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Scalable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments

  • David W. Nickerson (a1)
Abstract

Experiments conducted in the field allay concerns over external validity but are subject to the pitfalls of fieldwork. This article proves that scalable protocols conserve statistical efficiency in the face of problems implementing the treatment regime. Three designs are considered: randomly ordering the application of the treatment; matching subjects into groups prior to assignment; and placebo-controlled experiments. Three examples taken from voter mobilization field experiments demonstrate the utility of the design principles discussed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Scalable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Scalable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Scalable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Adams, William C., and Smith, Dennis J. 1980. “Effects of Telephone Canvassing on Turnout and Preferences: A Field Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 389395.
Allison, Paul D. 2002. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B. 1996a. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 444455.
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B. 1996b. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables: Rejoinder.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 468472.
Boruch, Robert, Snyder, Brook, and DeMoya, Dorothy. 2000. “The Importance of Randomized Field Trials.” Crime and Delinquency 46: 156180.
Box, George E.P., Hunter, William G., and Hunter, Stuart J. 1978. Statistics for Experiments. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50: 154165.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Direct Mail, and Telephone Contact on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94: 653663.
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Nickerson, David W. 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in a Local Election: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” Journal of Politics 65: 10831096.
Goodman, Jodi S., and Blum, Terry C. 1996. “Assessing the Non-random Sampling Effects of Subject Attrition in Longitudinal Research.” Journal of Management 22: 627652.
Groves, Robert M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.
Heckman, James J., and Smith, Jeffrey A. 1995. “Assessing the Case for Randomized Social Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 85110.
Heitjan, Daniel F. 1999. “Causal Inference in a Clinical Trial: A Comparative Example.” Controlled Clinical Trials 20: 309318.
Kish, Leslie. 1965. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.
Lichstein, Kenneth L., Riedel, Brant W., and Grieve, R. 1994. “Fair Tests of Clinical Trials: A Treatment Implementation Model.” Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy 16: 129.
Little, Roderick J.A., and Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Data Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.
Miller, Roy E., Bositis, David A., and Baer, Denise L. 1981. “Stimulating Voter Turnout in a Primary: Field Experiment with a Precinct Committeeman.” International Political Science Review 2: 445460.
Montgomery, Douglas C. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th ed. New York: Wiley.
Nickerson, David W. 2004a. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout.” Unpublished manuscript.
Nickerson, David W. 2004b. “Is Voting Contagious?” Unpublished manuscript.
Riffenburgh, R. H. 1998. Statistics in Medicine. San Diego: Academic.
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688701.
Rubin, Donald B. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers?Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 961962.
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Wu, Chien-Fu, and Hamada, Michael. 2000. Experiments: Planning, Analyzing, and Parameter Design Optimization. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed