Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rlmms Total loading time: 0.333 Render date: 2021-10-16T10:24:38.988Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Gender Gaps, Partisan Gaps, and Cross-Pressures: An Examination of American Attitudes toward the Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2020

Michael A. Hansen
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Parkside
Jennifer L. Clemens
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Kathleen Dolan
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Abstract

This article explores the gender gap in attitudes toward the use of military force in the United States. Given that the United States has been continuously engaged in war for the last 17 years, we revisit the topic and explore whether a gender gap in attitudes persists by utilizing Cooperative Congressional Election Study data for 2006–16. In addition, given the primacy of partisanship to issue attitudes, we go beyond examining the gender gap to explore the impact of partisanship on these attitudes. We find that women are less likely than men to support the use of force in most circumstances. We also find gender gaps in the Democratic and Republican parties and acknowledge the diversity among women and among men in these attitudes because of partisan identity. Finally, we identify points of cross-pressure on individuals whose gender and partisan identities pull them in different directions, namely, Republican women and Democratic men.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors will share all replication material upon request. We would like to thank the editors of Politics & Gender, as well as the three anonymous reviewers, for their feedback and guidance

References

Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Cassese, Erin C.. 2017. “American Party Women: A Look at the Gender Gap within Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, William, and Jeong, Gyung-Ho. 2020. “Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than Their Male Colleagues?” Political Research Quarterly 73 (1): 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Boef, Suzanna De, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, Lisa. 1992. “The Gender Gap and Attitudes toward War.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and Valentino, Benjamin A.. 2011. “A War of One's Own: Understanding the Gender Gap in Support for War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (2): 270–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas, and Layman, Geoffrey. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. 2020. “Straying from the Flock? A Look at How Americans’ Gender and Religious Identities Cross-Pressure Partisanship.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (1): 169–83.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2019. “Reconciling Sexism and Women's Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 41: 677700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2016. “Religious Beliefs, Gender Consciousness, and Women's Political Participation.” Sex Roles 75 (9–10): 514–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Sapiro, Virginia. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1079–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Nicholas T., and Mason, Lilliana. 2016. “Sorting and the Split-Ticket: Evidence from Presidential and Subpresidential Elections.” Political Behavior 38: 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckman, Melissa. 2016. Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates, Gender Stereotypes, and American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Hansen, Michael. 2018. “Blaming Women or Blaming the System? Public Perceptions of Women's Underrepresentation in Elected Office. Political Research Quarterly 7 (1): 668–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard. 2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States.” International Security 28 (1): 110–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard. 2016. “Gender Differences in American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force, 1982–2013.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Stephen. 2007. “The Myth of ‘Security Moms’ and ‘NASCAR Dads’: Parenthood, Political Stereotypes, and the 2004 Election.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 119.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Yuval. 2017. “The Rise and Decline of ‘Gender Gaps’ in Support for Military Action: United States, 1986–2011.” Politics & Gender 13 (4): 618–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fite, David, Genest, Marc, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1990. “Gender Differences in Foreign Policy Attitudes: A Longitudinal Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly 18 (4): 492513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Nancy. 1993. “The Gender Gap in Popular Attitudes toward the Use of Force.” In Women and the Use of Military Force, eds. Howes, Ruth H. and Stevenson, Michael R.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2338.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter D., and Reifler, Jason. 2006. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” International Security 30 (3): 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Michael A., and Dolan, Kathleen. 2020. “Voter Sex, Party, and Gender-Salient Issues: Attitudes about Sexual Harassment and Brett Kavanaugh in the 2018 Elections.” American Politics Research 48 (5): 532–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Michael A., and Goenaga, Agustín. 2019. “Gender and Democratic Attitudes: Do Women and Men Prioritize Different Democratic Institutions?Politics & Gender. Published online September 16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. 2003. “From Group Identity to Political Cohesion and Commitment.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 737–73.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, Capelos, Theresa, and Provost, Colin. 2002. “The Consequences of Terrorism: Disentangling the Effects of Personal and National Threat.” Political Psychology 23 (3): 485509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, and Cassese, Erin. 2009. “Terrorism, Anxiety, and War.” In Terrorism and Torture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, eds. Stritzke, Werner G. K., Lewandowsky, Stephan, Denamark, David, Clare, Joseph, and Morgan, Frank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, Taber, Charles, and Lahav, Gallya. 2005. “Threat, Anxiety, and Support for Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 593608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (4): 688708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies.” Political Behavior 24: 199236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2017. “Gender, Partisanship, and Issue Gaps.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 17 (1): 379405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Liliana. 2015. “‘I Disrepectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Patrick, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 2015. “Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (2): 225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nincic, Miroslav, and Nincic, Donna J.. 2002. “Race, Gender, and War.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 547–68.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2011. “War and Sacrifice in the Post-9/11 Era.” October 5. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/10/05/war-and-sacrifice-in-the-post-911-era/ (accessed October 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2018. “Trends in Party Affiliation among Demographic Groups.” March 20. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/ (accessed October 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Robert, and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Lise. 1994. “The Gender Gap in Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (4): 375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemlinger, Elizabeth. 2014. “The Gender Gap and Torture: Opposition to Torture Among Men and Women in the USA.” Social Science Journal 51 (1): 113–19.Google Scholar
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32: 587618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Reed, and Ramirez, Mark D.. 2018. “Exploring the Microfoundations of the Gender Equality Peace Hypothesis.” International Studies Review 20 (3): 345–67.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hansen et al. supplementary material

Hansen et al. supplementary material 1

Download Hansen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 77 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Gender Gaps, Partisan Gaps, and Cross-Pressures: An Examination of American Attitudes toward the Use of Force
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Gender Gaps, Partisan Gaps, and Cross-Pressures: An Examination of American Attitudes toward the Use of Force
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Gender Gaps, Partisan Gaps, and Cross-Pressures: An Examination of American Attitudes toward the Use of Force
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *