Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:52:53.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overcoming Obstacles in Quantitative Feminist Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Clair Apodaca
Clair Apodaca
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Feminist research is motivated by and concerned with social justice, equality, and the empowerment of women and other marginalized groups. The method I have chosen to further my feminist-inspired research is merely an analytical tool. Feminist principles apply to the act of research, the questions asked, and the data to be collected. Thus, the intersection of feminism and quantitative analysis offers a new method of knowledge production for the study of international relations. Yet my research design is traditional: Based on theory, testable hypotheses are formulated, data gathered, and findings reported. The purpose of this feminist-oriented quantitative research is to produce a body of knowledge that can explain, predict, or help elucidate empirical phenomena relevant to women's lives and issues.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 419 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerly, Brooke. 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clair, Apodaca. 1998. “Measuring Women's Economic and Social Rights Achievement.” Human Rights Quarterly 20 (1): 139–72.Google Scholar
Clair, Apodaca. 2008. “The Role of Women's Status and Empowerment in Alleviating Child Malnutrition.” Presented at the 2008 International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.Google Scholar
CEDAW. 1989. Statistical Data Concerning the Situation of Women, General Recommendation No. 9 UN GAOR, 1989 Doc No. A/44/38.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1998. “Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 193–98.Google Scholar
Maynard, Mary. 1994. “Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research.” In Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective, Maynard, Mary and Purvis, June (eds). London: Taylor & Francois.Google Scholar
Pavlovskaya, Marianna, and St. Martin, Kevin. 2007. “Feminism and Geographic Information Systems: From a Missing Object to a Mapping Subject.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princeton University Data, and Statistical Service. N.d. http://dss.princeton.edu/online_help/analysis/panel.htm (June 24, 2009).Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, Ann.. 2005. “What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to IR's Methodological Questions.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2006. Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crises. Human Development Report 2006. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
World Bank, FAO, IFAD. 2008. Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Agriculture and Rural Development Series. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar