Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T06:22:44.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of Corruption and the Dynamics of Women's Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2014

David Watson  and
Amy Moreland
David Watson
Affiliation:
Sul Ross State University
Amy Moreland
Affiliation:
Sul Ross State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A growing body of literature focuses on the attitudes produced by women's representation. One area of particular interest is the effect of women's representation on perceptions of corruption in government. Multiple scholars have found that citizens view women in government as more trustworthy and less corrupt. Others have suggested that the link between gender and corruption is spurious or dependent upon regime characteristics. Additionally, many studies of women's effect on corruption were published prior to the widespread adoption of gender quotas, when levels of women's representation were considerably lower. We argue that the relationship between women and perceptions of corruption can be better understood by applying an integrated model of representation, which explores the effects of formal, descriptive, and substantive representation on perceptions of corruption. Using a time-series analysis of 140 countries worldwide from 1998–2011, this study finds that women's descriptive and substantive representation are correlated with lower perceptions of corruption. However, gender quotas are correlated with higher perceptions of corruption among political elites.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 392 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Burchard, Stephanie M.. 2013. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women's Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 767–90.Google Scholar
Bauer, Gretchen. 2008. “Fifty/Fifty by 2020: Electoral Gender Quotas for Parliament in East and Southern Africa.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 10 (3): 348–68.Google Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. “Do Electoral Quotas Work after They are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 23–35.Google Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2003. “Who are the Women? Where are the Women? And What Difference Can They Make? Effects of Gender Parity in French Municipal Elections.” French Politics 1 (1): 5–38.Google Scholar
Braun, Miguel, and Di Tella, Rafael. 2004. “Inflation, Inflation Variability, and Corruption.” Economics and Politics 16 (1): 77–100.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, and Weder, Beatrice. 2003. “A Free Press is Bad News for Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics 87 (7–8): 1801–24.Google Scholar
Burnet, Jennie. 2012. “Women's Empowerment and Cultural Change in Rwanda.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 190–207.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization 65 (1): 103–37.Google Scholar
Caul Kittilson, Miki. 2006. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4): 638–45.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric, and Golden, Miriam. 2007. “Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 115–37.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. “What Are the Effects of Electoral Gender Quotas? From Studies of Quota Discourses to Research on Quota Effects.” Paper presented at the International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Fridenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Fridenvall, Lenita. 2010. “Judging Gender Quotas: Predictions and Result.” Policy and Politics 38 (3): 407–25.Google Scholar
Damania, Richard, Fredriksson, Per, and Mani, Muthukumara. 2004. “The Persistence of Corruption and Regulatory Compliance Failures: Theory and Evidence.” Public Choice 121 (3/4): 363–90.Google Scholar
Database of Political Institutions. 2012. http://www.nsd.uib.no/macrodataguide/set.html?id=11&sub=1 (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Dollar, David, Fisman, Raymond, and Gatti, Roberta. 1999. “Are Women Really the ‘Fairer’ Sex? Corruption and Women in Government.” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development, Working Paper Series, No. 4. World Bank Development Research Group.Google Scholar
Esarey, Justin, and Chirillo, Gina. 2013. “‘Fairer Sex’ or Purity Myth? Corruption, Gender, and Institutional Context.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 361–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Raymond J., and Gatti, Roberta. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 83 (3): 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., ed. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie. 2007. “Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force.” Development and Change 38 (1): 87–105.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Power, Timothy J.. 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (4): 83–104.Google Scholar
IDEA. 2013. Global Database of Quotas for Women. International IDEA and Stockholm University. http://quotaproject.org (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2013. “Database of Conditions of Work and Employment Laws.” http://www.ilo.org/dyn/travail/travmain.home (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2013. Women in National Parliaments. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Jagger, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2013. Polity IV Reports.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 613–29.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey, and Banducci, Susan. 2008. “When Politics is Not Just a Man's Game: Women's Representation and Political Representation.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 105–15.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 1999. “Governance Matters.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2196.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4): 638–45.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen, and Azfar, Omar. 2003. “Trade Intensity, Country Size and Corruption.” Economics of Governance 4 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 367–94.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Quota Laws for Women in Politics: Implications for Feminist Practice.” Social Politics 15 (3): 345–68.Google Scholar
Kunicova, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 573–606.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard, and Studlar, Donley. 1998. “Gender and the Electoral Opportunity Structure in the Canadian Provinces.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (1): 177–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2012. “Paradoxes in the Meaning of Quotas in Belgium.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 157–72.Google Scholar
Nanivadekar, Medha. 2006. “Are Quotas a Good Idea? The Indian Experience with Reserved Seats for Women.” Politics & Gender 2 (1): 119–28.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): 958–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 550–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.Google Scholar
Seldadyo, Harry, and de Haan, Jakob. 2006. “The Determinants of Corruption: A Literature Survey and New Evidence.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
Sung, Hung-En. 2003. “Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited.” Social Forces 82 (2): 703–23.Google Scholar
Swamy, Anand, Knack, Stephen, Lee, Young, and Axfar, Omar. 2000. “Gender and Corruption.” In Democracy, Governance, and Growth, ed. Knack, Stephen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 191–224.Google Scholar
Tavares, Jose. 2003. “Does Foreign Aid Corrupt?” Economic Letters 79 (1): 99–106.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 211–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2000. Women and Politics in Uganda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. “World Development Indicators.” http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Zetterberg, Par. 2009. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women's Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 715–30.Google Scholar