Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-v9xhf Total loading time: 0.321 Render date: 2022-05-20T05:50:09.051Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Who Does the Caring? Gender Disparities in COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2022

Miguel Carreras
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Sofia Vera
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Giancarlo Visconti
Affiliation:
Purdue University

Abstract

Do men and women exhibit different attitudes and behaviors toward COVID-19 public health measures? Is there a gender gap in support for and compliance with government recommendations during a public health crisis? While the disproportionate effect of the pandemic on women suggests that they would oppose burdensome quarantine measures, theories of gender differences in prosocial and communion attitudes indicate that women should be more likely to conform with public health measures designed to protect the most vulnerable. We test hypotheses about a gender gap in attitudes toward public health recommendations through an original, nationally representative survey implemented in Peru, one of the countries hit hardest by the coronavirus pandemic, and the construction of a representative matched sample that allows us to make comparisons between women and men. We find that women are more likely than men to endorse lockdown measures and to support the continuation of a nationwide quarantine. We also find evidence of a gender gap in compliance with public health recommendations about avoiding crowded areas and social gatherings. Our findings have important policy implications. The results suggest that public health recommendations to fight COVID-19 should be framed in a way that maximizes compliance by both men and women.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agencia Andina. 2020. “Decretan inmovilización social obligatoria desde 18:00 hrs. y 16.00 hrs en cinco regiones” [Social immobilization starting at 6 PM and 4 PM is announced in five regions]. March 30.Google Scholar
Agüero, Jorge M. 2021. “COVID-19 and the Rise of Intimate Partner Violence.” World Development 137: 105217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguero, Fernando, Adell, Manel N., Gimenez, Anna Perez, Medina, María J. Lopez, and Continente, Xavier Garcia. 2011. “Adoption of Preventive Measures during and after the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Pandemic Peak in Spain.” Preventive Medicine 53 (3): 203–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algara, Carlos, Fuller, Sam, and Hare, Christopher. 2020. “The Conditional Effect of Scientific Knowledge and Gender on Support for COVID-19 Government Containment Policies in a Partisan America.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 1075–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, Hunt, Boxell, Levi, Conway, Jacob C., Gentzkow, Matthew, Thaler, Michael, and Yang, David Y.. 2020. “Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Working Paper 26946, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26946 (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Alon, Titan M., Doepke, Matthias, Olmstead-Rumsey, Jane, and Tertilt, Michèle. 2020. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality.” Working Paper 26947, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26947 (accessed September 14, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Denise, and Horne, Christine. 2003. “Gender and Cooperation: Explaining Loan Repayment in Micro-Credit Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (3): 293302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayanian, John Z., Landon, Bruce E., Newhouse, Joseph P., and Zaslavsky, Alan M.. 2014. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities among Enrollees in Medicare Advantage Plans.” New England Journal of Medicine 371 (24): 2288–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, Magdalena, Vielma, Juan Pablo, and Zubizarreta, José R.. 2020. “Building Representative Matched Samples With Multi-valued Treatments in Large Observational Studies.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 29 (4): 744–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutel, Ann M., and Marini, Margaret Mooney. 1995. “Gender and Values.” American Sociological Review 60 (3): 436–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Scott, and Rolfe, Meredith. 2018. “Rethinking Compassion: Toward a Political Account of the Partisan Gender Gap in the United States.” Political Psychology 39 (4): 889906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesten, Jelke. 2012. “The State and Violence against Women in Peru: Intersecting Inequalities and Patriarchal Rule.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19 (3): 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohan, Janis S. 1993. “Regarding Gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 17 (1): 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, Sarah, Guedes, Alessandra, Goodwin, Mary M., and Mendoza, Jennifer Adams. 2012. Violence against Women in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Comparative Analysis of Population-Based Data from 12 Countries. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/3471 (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Brankston, Gabrielle, Merkley, Eric, Fisman, David N., Tuite, Ashleigh R., Poljak, Zvonimir, Loewen, Peter J., and Greer, Amy L.. 2021. “Socio-demographic Disparities in Knowledge, Practices, and Ability to Comply with COVID-19 Public Health Measures in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 112 (3): 363–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouard, Sylvain, Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, and Becher, Michael. 2020. “Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in France.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 53 (S2): 253–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, James P., Miller, David C., and Schafer, William D.. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (3): 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Ventura, Tiago. 2021. “Will I Get COVID-19? Partisanship, Social Media Frames, and Perceptions of Health Risk in Brazil.” Latin American Politics & Society 63 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, Miguel. 2018. “Why No Gender Gap in Electoral Participation? A Civic Duty Explanation.” Electoral Studies 52: 3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, Miguel, Vera, Sofia, and Visconti, Giancarlo. 2020. “Does Issue Framing Shape Support for Covid-19 Lockdown Measures? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Peru.” Forthcomimg. Research & Politics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrieri, Vincenzo, De Paola, Maria, and Gioia, Francesca 2020. “The Impact of Communication on Preferences for Public Policies: Evidence from a Field Experiment on the Covid19 Health-Wealth Trade-Off.” Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers, no. 25: 169–85.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1988. “Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980 and 1982.” In The Politics of The Gender Gap, ed. Mueller, Carol. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 236–57.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2018. “Quota Shocks: Electoral Gender Quotas and Government Spending Priorities Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 916–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, WIlliam G. 1965. “The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General) 128 (2): 234–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Paul T., Terracciano, Antonio, and McCrae, Robert R.. 2001. “Gender Differences in Personality Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2): 322–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Celia. 1995. “Competence versus Care? Gender and Caring Work Revisited.” Acta Sociologica 38 (1): 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslatte, Aaron. 2020. “To Shop or Shelter? Issue Framing Effects and Social-Distancing Preferences in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2010. “A Social Role Theory Perspective on Gender Gaps in Political Attitudes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (4): 486–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Henry A., and Myers, David J.. 2007. “From Thaw to Deluge: Party System Collapse in Venezuela and Peru.” Latin American Politics & Society 49 (2): 5986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Diekman, Amanda B., Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C., and Koenig, Anne M.. 2004. “Gender Gaps in Sociopolitical Attitudes: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 796816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, Alice H., and Steffen, Valerie J.. 1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (4): 735–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 2008. “Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1, eds. Plott, Charles and Smith, Vernon. New York: Elsevier, 1061–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Perfil. 2020. “Colegio Médico recomienda fumigación de mercados y centros comerciales por ser focos infecciosos de coronavirus” [Medical College recommends fumigation of markets and shopping malls to fight the spread of coronavirus]. April 6.Google Scholar
El Peruano. 2020. “Presidente anuncia multa para quienes incumplan cuarentena por coronavirus” [President announces fines for those who do not respect the coronavirus lockdown]. April 13.Google Scholar
Ferreyra, Marta, Avitabile, Ciro, Botero, Javier, Haimovich, Francisco, and Urzú, Sergio. 2017. At a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieze, Irene Hanson, and Li, Man Yu. 2010. “Gender, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior.” In Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, eds. Chrisler, Joan C. and McCreary, Donald R.. New York: Springer, 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2021. “Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” PLOS ONE 16 (4): e0249596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gausman, Jewel, and Langer, Ana. 2020. “Sex and Gender Disparities in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Women's Health 29 (4): 465–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1995. “Economic Man—Social Woman?” Comparative Political Studies 28 (3): 384408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2003. “Women to the Left? Gender Differences in Political Beliefs and Policy Preferences.” In Gender and Electoral Representation in Canada, eds. Tremblay, Manon and Trimble, Linda. New York: Oxford University Press, 140–59.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theories and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goossen, Mikael. 2020. “The Gender Gap in Welfare State Attitudes in Europe: The Role of Unpaid Labour and Family Policy.” Journal of European Social Policy 30 (4): 452–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica, Grossman, Guy, and Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2016. “Do Men and Women Have Different Policy Preferences in Africa? Determinants and Implications of Gender Gaps in Policy Prioritization.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 611–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosch, Kerstin, and Rau, Holger A.. 2016. “Gender Differences in Compliance: The Role of Social Value Orientation.” GlobalFood Discussion Paper 88, University of Göttingen. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/146902 (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens. 2017. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Heidi I., ed. 2006. Gendering Politics and Policy: Recent Developments in Europe, Latin America, and the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heap, Shaun Hargreaves, Koop, Christel, Matakos, Konstantinos, Unan, Asli, and Weber, Nina. 2020. “COVID-19 and People's Health-Wealth Preferences: Information Effects and Policy Implications.” Working Paper 2020-5, Department of Political Economy, King's College. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/mz67j/ (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 199236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Susan E., and Day, Christine L.. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, Guido W. 2015. “Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples.” Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 373419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática). 2018. Producción y Empleo Informal en el Perú: Cuenta Satélite de La Economía Informal 2007–2017. Lima: INEI. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1589/libro.pdf. (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
IOP (Instituto de Opinión Pública). 2014. Estudio Familia, Roles de Género y Violencia de Género. Lima: Universidad Católica del Perú. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/bitstream/handle/123456789/36496/IOP_1212_01_R_4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Johnson, Carol, and Williams, Blair. 2020. “Gender and Political Leadership in a Time of COVID.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 943–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2015. “The Statistics of Causal Inference: A View from Political Methodology.” Political Analysis 23 (3): 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Nielsen, Richard. 2019. “Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching.” Political Analysis 27 (4): 435–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Sylvan. 2020. “Powell: Social Distancing Is Crucial to Fast Economic Recovery.” The Hill, June 29. https://thehill.com/policy/finance/509679-powell-social-distancing-is-crucial-to-fast-economic-recovery (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2018. “Peru: The Institutionalization of Politics without Parties.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, ed. Mainwaring, Scott. New York: Cambridge University Press, 326–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Cameron, Maxwell A.. 2003. “Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori's Peru.” Latin American Politics and Society 45 (3): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Wenchi, Shediac-Rizkallah, Mona C., Celentano, David D., and Rohde, Charles. 1999. “A Population-Based Study of Age and Gender Differences in Patterns of Health-Related Behaviors.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 17 (1): 817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2020. Gender Differences in Public Opinion: Values and Political Consequences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Carly E., Jalali, Falak, Ali, Syed Shoaib, Gupta, Divya, Shrestha, Suchita, and Fischer, Harry. 2020. “The Gendered Impacts of COVID-19 amid Agrarian Distress: Opportunities for Comprehensive Policy Response in Agrarian South Asia.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 1142–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2017. Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) Regional Report for Latin America and the Caribbean. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OIT (Organización Internacional de Trabajo). 2019. Mujeres En El Mundo Del Trabajo. Retos Pendientes Hacia Una Efectiva Equidad En América Latina y El Caribe. Panorama Laboral Temático (5). Lima: Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe.Google Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A. 2010. “Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 243–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Carl L., and Peterson, Rolfe D.. 2020. “Toxic Mask-ulinity: The Link between Masculine Toughness and Affective Reactions to Mask Wearing in the COVID-19 Era.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 1044–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, Samuel D., Kelz, Rachel R., Silber, Jeffrey H., and Rosenbaum, Paul R.. 2015. “Large, Sparse Optimal Matching with Refined Covariate Balance in an Observational Study of the Health Outcomes Produced by New Surgeons.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110 (510): 515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piras, Claudia. 2020. “Women in Latin America and the Caribbean Face Greater Risks from Coronavirus.” Inter-American Development Bank, March 23. https://blogs.iadb.org/igualdad/en/women-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-face-greater-risks-from-coronavirus/ (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Powell, Melanie, and Ansic, David. 1997. “Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour in Financial Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Economic Psychology 18 (6): 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Kate. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Increased the Care Burden of Women and Families.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 6773.Google Scholar
Reny, Tyler. 2020. “Masculine Norms and Infectious Disease: The Case of COVID-19.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 1028–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 1998. “Multivariate Matching Methods.” Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 2: 435–38.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational Studies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2010. Design of Observational Studies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2015. “Two R Packages for Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Studies.” Observational Studies 1: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Rubin, Donald B.. 1984. “Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (387): 516–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Silber, Jeffrey H.. 2001. “Matching and Thick Description in an Observational Study of Mortality after Surgery.” Biostatistics 2 (2): 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeed, Balsam Q., Al-Shahrabi, Rula, and Bolarinwa, Obasanjo. 2021. “Socio-demographic Correlate of Knowledge and Practice toward COVID-19 among People Living in Mosul-Iraq: A Cross-sectional Study.” PLOS ONE 16 (3): e0249310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, David P., Realo, Anu, Voracek, Martin, and Allik, Jüri. 2008. “Why Can't a Man Be More Like a Woman? Sex Differences in Big Five Personality Traits across 55 Cultures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (1): 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 487508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shay, Laine P. 2020. “Closing Time! Examining the Impact of Gender and Executive Branch Policy Makers on the Timing of Stay-at-Home Orders.” Politics & Gender 16 (4): 935–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alison. 2004. “On the Genealogy of Women: A Defence of Anti-Essentialism.” In Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration, eds. Gillis, Stacy, Howie, Gillian, and Munford, Rebecca. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Elizabeth A. 2010. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.” Statistical Science 25 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Catherine S., and Wong, Chi-yan. 2004. “Factors Influencing the Wearing of Facemasks to Prevent the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome among Adult Chinese in Hong Kong.” Preventive Medicine 39 (6): 1187–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tom, Ariane, and Granie, Marie-Axelle. 2011. “Gender Differences in Pedestrian Rule Compliance and Visual Search at Signalized and Unsignalized Crossroads.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 43 (5): 17941801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UN Women. 2021. “The Shadow Pandemic: Violence against Women during COVID-19.” https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/in-focus-gender-equality-in-covid-19-response/violence-against-women-during-covid-19 (accessed February 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Utych, Stephen M. 2020. “Messaging Mask Wearing during the COVID-19 Crisis: Ideological Differences.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 8 (2): 91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valladolid, Mayela, and López, Edgardo. 2011. Brechas de Genero en el Uso del Tiempo. Lima: Ministerio de la Mujer y Desarrollo Social. https://www.mimp.gob.pe/files/direcciones/dgignd/publicaciones/Brechas-de-genero-en-el-Uso-del-Tiempo.pdf (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Vazquez, Meagan, Bash, Dana, and Collins, Kaitlan. 2020. “Trump Tweets Image of Himself Wearing a Mask and Calls It Patriotic.” CNN, July 20. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/20/politics/donald-trump-mask-tweet/index.html (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Verick, Sher. 2018. “Female Labor Force Participation and Development.” IZA World of Labor, December. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Giancarlo, and Zubizarreta, José. 2018. “Handling Limited Overlap in Observational Studies with Cardinality Matching.” Observational Studies 4: 217–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waerness, Kari. 1984. “The Rationality of Caring.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 5 (2): 185211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (World Health Organization). 2006. “Summary Report: WHO Multi-country Survey on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women, Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes, and Women's Responses.” http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/summary_report/summary_report_English2.pdf (accessed September 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Williams, John E., and Best, Deborah L.. 1990. Sex and the Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, José R. 2012. “Using Mixed Integer Programming for Matching in an Observational Study of Kidney Failure after Surgery.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 107 (500): 1360–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, José R., Paredes, Ricardo D., and Rosenbaum, Paul R.. 2014. “Matching for Balance, Pairing for Heterogeneity in an Observational Study of the Effectiveness of For-Profit and Not-for-Profit High Schools in Chile.” Annals of Applied Statistics 8 (1): 204–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carreras et al. supplementary material

Appendix A-H

Download Carreras et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 143 KB

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Who Does the Caring? Gender Disparities in COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Who Does the Caring? Gender Disparities in COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Who Does the Caring? Gender Disparities in COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *