Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-pd9xq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T17:24:48.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Women Earn High Marks: Examining the Role of Partisanship and Gender in Political Evaluations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Lindsey Cormack Open the ORCID record for Lindsey Cormack [Opens in a new window]  and
Kristyn L. Karl Open the ORCID record for Kristyn L. Karl [Opens in a new window]
Lindsey Cormack
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology
Kristyn L. Karl
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present the results of a randomized survey experiment demonstrating that the public evaluates women politicians more highly than men across multiple characteristic assessments. This finding is consistent with a recent wave of research indicating greater preferences for women politicians. Which respondents rate women politicians more highly, and why? We find that women and younger voters do not account for the greater marks given to women politicians. Instead, respondent partisanship and the presumed partisanship of the politician account for a great deal of our findings, with gender playing a complicating role. Democratic and Republican respondents are apt to project their own partisanship onto politicians, and across both parties, we find higher assessments for co-partisan politicians and for women politicians. On the whole, women politicians are evaluated on par with or significantly higher than men politicians across six characteristics, scoring especially well relative to men when politicians are presumed to be members of the opposing party and when traditionally feminine characteristics are assessed.

Keywords

Women in politicssurvey experimentpublic opinion
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 768 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the participants at the 2019 Southern Political Science Association Annual Conference and the 2018 American Political Science Association Annual Conference for their feedback on earlier versions of this work. We also thank the College of Arts and Letters at Stevens Institute of Technology for the funding to create and run the surveys used herein.

References

REFERENCES

Aalberg, Toril, and Jenssen, Anders Todal. 2007. “Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication.” Nordicom Review 28 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anastasopoulos, Lefteris. 2016. “Estimating the Gender Penalty in House of Representatives Elections Using a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Electoral Studies 43: 150–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronow, Peter M., Baron, Jonathon, and Pinson, Lauren. 2018. “A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check.” Political Analysis 27 (4): 572–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2018. “Someone Like Me: Descriptive Representation and Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (1): 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2018. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020. The Qualifications Gap: Why Women Must Be Better than Men to Win Political Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brians, Craig Leonard. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C., Ono, Yoshikuni, and Yamada, Masahiro. 2017. “Reassessing Public Support for a Female President.” Journal of Politics 79 (3): 1073–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, P., and Feldman, S.. 1986. “The Role of Inference in the Perception of Political Candidates.” Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ed. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 127–58.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jarret T., Jussim, Lee, Madon, Stephanie, Cain, Thomas R., and Stevens, Sean T.. 2011. “The Use of Stereotypes and Individuating Information in Political Person Perception.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 (4): 529–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2014. “A Partisan Gap in the Supply of Female Potential Candidates in the United States.” Research & Politics 1 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pinto, Jennifer. 2019. “Women Think U.S. Would Be Better Off with More Women in Office—CBS News Poll.” CBS News, January 18. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/women-think-u-s-would-be-better-off-with-more-women-in-office-cbs-news-poll/ (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa. 2019. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Prejudice: Sexism, Information, and Voting Behavior In Political Campaigns.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (3): 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1997. “Gender Differences in Support for Women Candidates: Is There a Glass Ceiling in American Politics?” Journal of Women & Politics 17 (2): 27–41.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Hansen, Michael. 2018. “Blaming Women or Blaming the System? Public Perceptions of Women's Underrepresentation in Elected Office.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (3): 668–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovere, Edward-Isaac. 2017. “Democrats Recruit Veterans Early for 2018 Battle.” Politico, April 4. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/veterans-house-democrats-recruiting-236845 (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 2007. “Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage: Resolving the Contradictions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 31 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambino, Lauren. 2018. “‘Truly the Year of the Women’: Female Candidates Win in Record Numbers.” The Guardian, November 7. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/07/women-candidates-midterms-wins (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine, and Tate, Katherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19 (1): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Carlin, John. 2014. “Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (6): 641–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedlund, Ronald D., Freeman, Patricia K., Hamm, Keith E., and Stein, Robert M.. 1979. “The Electability of Women Candidates: The Effects of Sex Role Stereotypes.” Journal of Politics 41 (2): 513–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Elizabeth D., and Sloman, Celeste. 2019. “Redefining Representation: The Women of the 116th Congress.” New York Times, January 14. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/14/us/politics/women-of-the-116th-congress.html (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsmeier, Matthew L. 2015. “From Black and White to Left and Right: Race, Perceptions of Candidates’ Ideologies, and Voting Behavior in US House Elections.” Political Behavior 37 (3): 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Kristyn L., and Ryan, Timothy J.. 2016. “When Are Stereotypes about Black Candidates Applied? An Experimental Test.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 1 (2): 253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Lühiste, Maarja. 2016. “Explaining Political Engagement with Online Panels: Comparing the British and American Election Studies.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (3): 666–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 1997. “Candidate Gender and Women's Psychological Engagement in Politics.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (1): 118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtzleben, Danielle. 2018. “More Than Twice as Many Women Are Running for Congress in 2018 Compared with 2016.” National Public Radio, Feburary 20. https://www.npr.org/2018/02/20/585542531/more-than-twice-as-many-women-are-running-for-congress-in-2018-compared-to-2016 (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post–September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, Alison P., Bryan, Angela, Hastie, Reid, and Fischer, Oliver. 2007. “We Want the Same Thing: Projection in Judgments of Sexual Intent.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (7): 975–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maas, Megan K., McCauley, Heather L., Bonomi, Amy E., and Gisela Leija, S.. 2018. “‘I Was Grabbed by My Pussy and Its# NotOkay’: A Twitter Backlash against Donald Trump's Degrading Commentary.” Violence Against Women 24 (14): 1739–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacManus, Susan A., and Bullock, Charles S., eds. 2003. The Municipal Year Book 2003: The Form, Structure, and Composition of America's Municipalities in the New Millennium. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2007 “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 286–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathison, David L. 1988. “Assumed Similarity in Communication Styles: Implications for Personnel Interviews.” Group & Organization Studies 13 (1): 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, M. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merica, Dan, and Grayer, Annie. 2018. “‘Country over Party’: Democrats Turn to Veterans to Take Back the House.” CNN, June 30. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/30/politics/veterans-running-democrats-midterms/index.html (accessed April 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2014. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 357–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2018. “American Trends Panel Wave 37 (Version 2).” Cornell University, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31115418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, Mitchell, Latella, Lauren, Stern, Chadly, and Jost, John T.. 2016. “Beliefs about Childhood Vaccination in the United States: Political Ideology, False Consensus, and the Illusion of Uniqueness.” PLOS ONE 11 (7): e0158382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenwasser, Shirley Miller, and Dean, Norma G.. 1989. “Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (1): 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Lee, Greene, David, and House, Pamela. 1977. “The ‘False Consensus Effect’: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (3): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “If US Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3 (1–2): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., MacWilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Explaining White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Susanne, and Coppock, Alexander. 2020. “What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-analysis of 42 Factorial Survey Experiments.” https://alexandercoppock.com/papers/SC_gender.pdf (accessed April 16, 2021).Google Scholar
Sigelman, Carol K., Thomas, Dan B., Sigelman, Lee, and Ribich, Frederick D.. 1986. “Gender, Physical Attractiveness, and Electability: An Experimental Investigation of Voter Biases.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16 (3): 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Chadly, West, Tessa V., Jost, John T., and Rule, Nicholas O.. 2014. “‘Ditto Heads’: Do Conservatives Perceive Greater Consensus within Their Ranks than Liberals?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40 (9): 1162–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strube, Michael J., and Rahimi, Amanda M.. 2006. “‘Everybody Knows It's True’: Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism Moderate False Consensus for Stereotypic Beliefs.” Journal of Research in Personality 40 (6): 1038–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Nina G., and Vanes, J. C.. 1978. “Women in local Politics.” Community Development 9 (2): 43–51.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, Kalla, Joshua, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2018. “The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 525–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielmann, Isabel, Hilbig, Benjamin E., and Zettler, Ingo. 2020. “Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 118 (1): 172–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Seth, and Steckenrider, Janie. 1997. “The Relative Irrelevance of Candidate Sex.” Women & Politics 17 (4): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Wayne, Carly, and Oceno, Marzia. 2018. “Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (1): 799–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (4): 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasburn, Philo C., and Wasburn, Mara H.. 2011. “Media Coverage of Women in Politics: The Curious Case of Sarah Palin.” Media, Culture & Society 33 (7): 1027–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Sigelman, Lee. 1982. “Changes in Public Attitudes toward Women in Politics.” Social Science Quarterly 63 (2): 312–22.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cormack and Karl supplementary material

Cormack and Karl supplementary material

Download Cormack and Karl supplementary material(File)
File 1.9 MB